У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно A UGANDAN JUDGE JAILED IN THE UK FOR FORCING A WOMAN INTO SLAVERY или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
A troubling case recently hit the headlines: Justice Lydia Mugambe, a High Court judge and UN tribunal member, was convicted in the UK for forced labour and human trafficking. She lured a Ugandan woman to the UK under false pretenses, forced her into unpaid domestic work, confiscated her documents, and intimidated a witness—leading to a conviction in early 2025 Mugambe, born on 24 March 1975, is a lawyer and former High Court judge (2013–2020) She also served as a judge on United Nations criminal tribunals and was pursuing a PhD in law at the University of Oxford in 2024 when the case unfolded. In March 2025, Oxford Crown Court found her guilty on multiple serious charges, including: Conspiring to breach UK immigration law Arranging or facilitating travel for exploitation Requiring someone to perform forced or compulsory labour Conspiracy to intimidate a witness. Disclaimer: The information provided about the Ugandan High Court judge, Justice Lydia Mugambe Ssali, and her conviction in the United Kingdom is based on publicly available sources, including reputable news outlets, court records, and official statements as of 2025. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this summary, it is not intended to substitute legal or official documentation. Justice Mugambe’s conviction followed due legal process in the UK, and she maintains the right to appeal. Any views or interpretations presented here do not represent any official position of the Ugandan Judiciary, the United Nations, or any other institution. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources or legal professionals for further information or clarification. The inclusion of names, titles, and allegations does not imply guilt beyond the established legal judgment, nor should it be construed to tarnish the reputation of individuals or institutions uninvolved in the proceedings.