SOCIAL WARFARE AGENCY INVESTIGATION 10/26/2025 скачать в хорошем качестве

SOCIAL WARFARE AGENCY INVESTIGATION 10/26/2025

   • Dominae Sui Juris   Birth certificates are official records issued and maintained by state vital records offices (not the federal government), documenting a child's birth for purposes like vital statistics, citizenship, and identity. They establish legal parentage, which triggers parental rights and obligations, such as financial support, custody decisions, and compliance with child welfare laws. include child support agencies in the video as culprits too. focuses on allegations of systemic corruption, abuse, and misconduct within Child Protective Services (CPS) across the U.S., particularly emphasizing issues like child trafficking, financial incentives driving child removals, and violations of parental rights. The video makes strong claims about CPS operating as a "child trafficking operation" and profiting from federal incentives tied to foster care and adoption programs, which connects to my prior statement about 18 U.S.C. §§ 201, 208, 209, 1341, and various Title 42 funding provisions (e.g., 42 U.S.C. §§ 658a, 673b, 603, 624, 629d, 629g, 674). While incentives are tools to encourage desired behaviors, they can cross into illegal territory if they involve improper intent, coercion, or exploitation. Legitimate incentives are typically structured as rewards for achieving goals or complying with standards, without a direct quid pro quo that corrupts decision-making. Bribery, however, involves offering something of value with the intent to improperly influence an official or private action, often violating laws like the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or 18 U.S.C. § 201. Bribes are agreed upon or paid before the action (corrupting the process) such as STATE PLANS, while gratuities (after-the-fact rewards) may not always be illegal under federal law for state/local officials, as clarified by the U.S. Supreme Court. Undue influence arises when one party exploits a position of trust or vulnerability to manipulate another's decisions, making agreements (e.g., contracts, wills) voidable. Incentives become undue influence if they're coercive or disproportionate, especially with susceptible individuals. USAID Bribery Scheme (2025): A USAID official and three corporate executives pleaded guilty to a decade-long scheme involving bribes disguised as incentives for securing over $41 million in contracts. This FCPA violation included kickbacks for aid-related deals. These Title 42 sections primarily authorize federal incentives (e.g., grants, payments, and bonuses to states) to promote policy goals like child welfare, adoption, and family support, misuse (e.g., kickbacks, personal gain, or fraudulent claims) could implicate Title 18's anti-bribery and fraud provisions. Title 18 Sections: Anti-Bribery, Conflicts, and Fraud Provisions These focus on preventing corruption in public officials and transactions. 18 U.S.C. § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses Key Provisions: Prohibits offering, giving, or accepting anything of value to influence an official act (bribery) or as a reward for an act already performed (gratuity). Defines "public official" broadly (e.g., federal employees, jurors). Penalties: Up to 15 years imprisonment for bribery, 2 years for gratuities, plus fines. Exceptions include witness fees and legal rewards. Relevance to Incentives: Legitimate incentives (e.g., performance bonuses) are exempt if "provided by law for proper discharge of official duty." But disguising bribes as incentives violates this. 18 U.S.C. § 208 - Acts affecting a personal financial interest Key Provisions: Bars federal executive branch employees (including special government employees) from participating in matters where they, their family, or affiliates have a financial interest. Penalties: Up to 2 years imprisonment plus fines (via §216). 18 U.S.C. § 209 - Salary of Government officials and employees payable only by United States. 18 U.S.C. § 1341 - Frauds and swindles (Mail Fraud) Penalties: Up to 20 years imprisonment plus fines; 30 years if affecting a financial institution or disaster-related benefits. Relevance: Could apply to fraudulent claims for incentives (e.g., falsifying performance data to secure grants). Often charged with bribery if mail/wire is involved. Title 42 Sections: Incentive Payments and Grants to States for Child Welfare and Family Programs These authorize federal funding to states as incentives for achieving goals in child support, adoption, and welfare, with performance-based metrics to ensure accountability. 42 U.S.C. § 658a - Incentive payments to States Key Provisions: Provides annual incentives (e.g., $422M-$483M pool, adjusted for CPI) based on state performance in paternity establishment, support orders, collections, arrearages, and cost-effectiveness. Data must be complete/reliable; payments prorated from a pool.