Скачать с ютуб Rule of Estoppel, Case law Khan Gul vs Lakha Singh Business law B Com Delhi University в хорошем качестве

Rule of Estoppel, Case law Khan Gul vs Lakha Singh Business law B Com Delhi University

#ECONOMICFORUPSC #Vishnueconomicsschool #NTANETECONOMICS Website www.vishnueconomicsschool.in NOTES AND BOOK STORE; - https://www.instamojo.com/vishnugupta... Download my app Vishnu ECONOMICS SCHOOL from playlist or link is given below https://play.google.com/store/apps/de... Contact Phone Number: 9711855529 Mail id: [email protected] TELEGRAM ;- https://t.me/Vishnueconomicsschool Our channel for commerce students WEBSITE www.vishnueconomicsschool.in DEMO ENGLISH MEDIUM    • MICROECONOMICS   HINDI MEDIUM    • Плейлист   The problem of estoppel against the minor created legal problems between the authorities. But the responsible authority has decided that there is no such estoppel against a juvenile. Estoppel means that if a person makes a comment that misleads another person, he or she cannot refute the same statement in the future as his or her duty to make a statement occurs. The theory of estoppel forbids a group from saying anything that violates its prior claims. As a consequence, the minor is not prohibited from providing child protection.  The explanation is that there should be no stumbling block against the legislative rule set down in the statute. But in the case of Mohiri Bibi, the defendant misinterpreted his age in order to mortgage his house, but the money-lender was already aware that the defendant was a minor. Accordingly, the Privy Council did not recognize the doctrine of estoppel since the appellant was not deceived or misled by the argument of the minor. In the light of the various rulings of the different High Courts of India, it should be noted that a minor can plead a minority as mitigation even if, at the time of the arrangement, he wrongly declared that he was not a minor.