Llama 4 is NOT Open Source! скачать в хорошем качестве

Llama 4 is NOT Open Source!

https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-m... No, this license does not fully qualify as an open-source license based on the generally accepted definitions and principles of open source. Here's a breakdown of why: Key Issues Preventing Open Source Compliance: Commercial Restriction (Section 2): This is the biggest problem. The license includes a usage restriction based on the number of monthly active users of the licensee's products or services. If usage exceeds 700 million monthly active users, a commercial license from Meta is required. This significantly limits commercial use and is a direct violation of the freedom to use the software for any purpose, a core principle of open source. "Built with Llama" Requirement (Section 1.b.i): The requirement to display "Built with Llama" is a form of attribution stacking which some open source proponents dislike as it creates a burden of attribution when combining many components. While generally considered less problematic than usage restrictions, the sheer volume of these types of requirements in an ecosystem could make using the project more cumbersome. The requirement to include "Llama" at the beginning of any AI model name derived from or using the Llama Materials is also problematic from an open-source perspective, though less severe than the commercial restrictions. Why These Issues Matter for Open Source: Open-source licenses, like those approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI), generally adhere to these principles: Freedom to use: Users are free to use the software for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. Freedom to study: Users have access to the source code and can examine how the software works. Freedom to redistribute: Users can redistribute the software. Freedom to modify: Users can modify the software and release their modified versions. No Discrimination: Open source licenses cannot discriminate against a specific field of endeavor or group of people. In summary: This "Llama 4 Community License" is more accurately described as a source-available license or a shared source license, rather than a true open-source license. It provides access to the source code and allows modification and redistribution, but it places significant restrictions on its commercial use, making it incompatible with the principles of open source. ❤️ If you want to support the channel ❤️ Support here: Patreon -   / 1littlecoder   Ko-Fi - https://ko-fi.com/1littlecoder 🧭 Follow me on 🧭 Twitter -   / 1littlecoder