【歴史が隠した東京裁判の真実】極東国際軍事法廷の全貌：東条英機と昭和天皇の運命 скачать в хорошем качестве

【歴史が隠した東京裁判の真実】極東国際軍事法廷の全貌：東条英機と昭和天皇の運命

📌 内容： 00:00 第二次世界大戦終結と日本の降伏 01:04 マッカーサーと昭和天皇の処遇問題 02:08 天皇とマッカーサーの会談写真が与えた衝撃 03:13 東條英機の自殺未遂と逮捕 04:17 アメリカ軍による東條英機の拘束 05:20 極東国際軍事裁判の設立 06:26 戦犯の分類と裁判の進行 07:30 被告人の弁護と法廷の混乱 08:35 証人の登場と冷戦構造の影響 10:43 判決と戦犯の最終処分 1945年8月15日、昭和天皇の玉音放送による無条件降伏から始まった戦後日本。 マッカーサーによる日本占領、昭和天皇との歴史的な会見、そして極東国際軍事法廷（東京裁判）で裁かれた東条英機ら戦犯たち。 なぜ昭和天皇は裁かれなかったのか？ なぜ東条英機は失敗した自決で嘲笑されたのか？ 溥儀や田中隆吉らの証言は何を暴いたのか？ そして「歴史は東京裁判をどう評価するのか」。 この動画では、戦後史を大きく揺るがせた「東京裁判」の裏側と、その象徴的な瞬間を徹底解説します。視聴者は当時の国際政治の駆け引き、そして昭和天皇の処遇を巡る葛藤を深く理解できるでしょう。 📖 キーワード: #東京裁判 #昭和天皇 #マッカーサー #極東国際軍事法廷 #東条英機 #日本降伏 #第二次世界大戦 #戦犯 #戦後日本 #歴史解説 #溥儀 #田中隆吉 #吉田茂 #戦後史 #占領下日本 #戦後改革 #戦後政治 #日本近代史 #戦争責任 #歴史ドキュメンタリー #歴史の真実 #連合国 #マッカーサー会見 #戦後東京 #戦犯裁判 #戦後国際関係 #戦後秩序 #戦争犯罪 #南京大虐殺 #歴史研究 📚 「論文・参考文献」: Political strategy by MacArthur: MacArthur saw Hirohito as crucial to stabilizing postwar Japan, so he shielded him from prosecution and portrayed him as a ceremonial figure (Kawamura, 2007) , (Brands, 2006) , (“This Fundamental Problem”, 2002) Emperor’s real involvement ignored: Scholars argue Hirohito had direct involvement in military decisions and war crimes, but this was downplayed by both U.S. and Japanese leadership (Bix, 2019) , (Yi-nian, 2005) , (Buuren, 2023) Failed suicide and subsequent humiliation: Tojo’s suicide attempt was botched—possibly due to poor planning or interference—and the U.S. used it as propaganda to discredit him as cowardly (Sellars, 2019) Depiction in the courtroom: Courtroom dramas, including film and transcripts, emphasized Tojo’s diminishing authority and symbolic fall (Noone, 2007) Puyi’s testimony: Highlighted Japan’s manipulation of Manchuria and puppet governance—used to expose Japanese imperialism (Noone, 2007) Tanaka Ryukichi: Testified in support of war responsibility, especially in the context of Japan’s expansionist policies, helping to reinforce prosecution narratives (Totani, 2011) Victor’s justice critique: Many scholars argue that the Tokyo Trials prioritized punishment of Japanese leaders over legal consistency or fairness, with little accountability for Allied crimes (Pathak, 2021) , (Sedgwick, 2020) Legal legacy and Nuremberg link: Despite its flaws, the Tokyo Tribunal helped lay the groundwork for international humanitarian law and command responsibility (Totani, 2010) , (Sellars, 2019) Colonial questions ignored: The trial largely ignored Japanese colonial crimes in Korea and other parts of Asia, which still affects regional relations (Chong, 2017) Cultural memory gap: Japan’s postwar narrative minimized war crimes responsibility, preserving Hirohito’s image and reshaping collective memory (Buuren, 2023) , (Tanaka, 2023) Commonwealth influence: Though often seen as U.S.-dominated, the Commonwealth nations had more influence on the trial than commonly assumed (Takatori, 2007) American defense lawyers: Some U.S. lawyers defended Japanese leaders, believing in due process, even for accused war criminals (Glazer, 2017) Women's Tribunal (2000): Found Hirohito guilty posthumously in a symbolic trial for sexual violence crimes, showing lingering global discontent (Matsui, 2002) , (Zhiliang, 2001) Yasukuni Shrine controversy: Hirohito stopped visiting after it enshrined Class A war criminals like Tojo, reflecting his political calculation (Asia-Pacific Journal, 2007)