• ClipSaver
  • dtub.ru
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] скачать в хорошем качестве

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] 2 года назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument]
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument]

Oral argument audio (including transcript) of case [19-1392] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization argued at the Supreme Court of the United States on Dec 1, 2021. More information about the case: Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v... Justia: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fede... (including opinion) Docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.a... Oyez.org: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/19-1392 Video produced based on information and transcripts on oyez.org, licensed under a CC-BY-NC License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.... Not affiliated with oyez.org or the Supreme Court. Argued on Dec 1, 2021. Decided on Jun 24, 2022. Petitioner: Thomas E. Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. Respondent: Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. Advocates: Scott G. Stewart (for the Petitioners) Julie Rikelman (for the Respondents) Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents) Chapters 0:00:00 Scott G. Stewart 0:44:30 Julie Rikelman 1:23:55 Elizabeth B. Prelogar 1:50:26 Rebuttal: Scott G. Stewart Facts of the case (from oyez.org) In 2018, Mississippi passed a law called the “Gestational Age Act,” which prohibits all abortions, with few exceptions, after 15 weeks’ gestational age. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only licensed abortion facility in Mississippi, and one of its doctors filed a lawsuit in federal district court challenging the law and requesting an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO). After a hearing, the district court granted the TRO while the litigation proceeded to discovery. After discovery, the district court granted the clinic’s motion for summary judgment and enjoined Mississippi from enforcing the law, finding that the state had not provided evidence that a fetus would be viable at 15 weeks, and Supreme Court precedent prohibits states from banning abortions prior to viability. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Question Is Mississippi’s law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks’ gestational age unconstitutional? Conclusion The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, are overruled. Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion of the Court. The Constitution does not mention abortion. The right is neither deeply rooted in the nation’s history nor an essential component of “ordered liberty.” The five factors that should be considered in deciding whether a precedent should be overruled support overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey: (1) they “short-circuited the democratic process,” (2) both lacked grounding in constitutional text, history, or precedent, (3) the tests they established were not “workable,” (4) they caused distortion of law in other areas, and (5) overruling them would not upend concrete reliance interests. Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh concurred. Chief Justice John Roberts concurred in the judgment. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

Comments
  • Oral Argument on a prison shaving the hair of a Rastafarian: Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections 19 часов назад
    Oral Argument on a prison shaving the hair of a Rastafarian: Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections
    Опубликовано: 19 часов назад
  • U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Трансляция закончилась 3 года назад
    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Опубликовано: Трансляция закончилась 3 года назад
  • Oral Argument on how 10 месяцев назад
    Oral Argument on how "false" and "misleading" differ: Thompson v. United States
    Опубликовано: 10 месяцев назад
  • Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat 1 месяц назад
    Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
    Опубликовано: 1 месяц назад
  • Extended interview: Justice Amy Coney Barrett 2 месяца назад
    Extended interview: Justice Amy Coney Barrett
    Опубликовано: 2 месяца назад
  • How Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Does Her Job 2 недели назад
    How Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Does Her Job
    Опубликовано: 2 недели назад
  • How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade 3 года назад
    How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • The Transcribed Interview of Neera Tanden | The Biden Autopen Presidency 3 недели назад
    The Transcribed Interview of Neera Tanden | The Biden Autopen Presidency
    Опубликовано: 3 недели назад
  • Lawrence v. Texas [Oral Argument + Opinion] 2 года назад
    Lawrence v. Texas [Oral Argument + Opinion]
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • Rucho v. Common Cause [Oral Argument + Opinion] 2 года назад
    Rucho v. Common Cause [Oral Argument + Opinion]
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • [Landmark Cases] Oral Argument + Opinion: SFFA v. Harvard 2 месяца назад
    [Landmark Cases] Oral Argument + Opinion: SFFA v. Harvard
    Опубликовано: 2 месяца назад
  • Forced Labor For Detained Immigrants Debated In Supreme Court | Full Oral Arguments 11 дней назад
    Forced Labor For Detained Immigrants Debated In Supreme Court | Full Oral Arguments
    Опубликовано: 11 дней назад
  • Собчак подралась с Соболь. Тайны Высоцкой. Покушение на Шойгу. Исповедь Моргенштерна. Где Лавров? 3 часа назад
    Собчак подралась с Соболь. Тайны Высоцкой. Покушение на Шойгу. Исповедь Моргенштерна. Где Лавров?
    Опубликовано: 3 часа назад
  • Влад Листьев — человек, изменивший телевидение (English subtitles) @Максим Кац 20 часов назад
    Влад Листьев — человек, изменивший телевидение (English subtitles) @Максим Кац
    Опубликовано: 20 часов назад
  • [Landmark Cases] Do GPS trackers violate Fourth Amendment? United States v. Jones 1 месяц назад
    [Landmark Cases] Do GPS trackers violate Fourth Amendment? United States v. Jones
    Опубликовано: 1 месяц назад
  • Legal Experts Explain How Elizabeth Prelogar Absolutely Owns the Supreme Court Conservatives 1 год назад
    Legal Experts Explain How Elizabeth Prelogar Absolutely Owns the Supreme Court Conservatives
    Опубликовано: 1 год назад
  • FULL HEARING: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Case On Reducing Prison Sentences 9 дней назад
    FULL HEARING: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Case On Reducing Prison Sentences
    Опубликовано: 9 дней назад
  • [Landmark Cases] Oral Argument: 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis 1 месяц назад
    [Landmark Cases] Oral Argument: 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
    Опубликовано: 1 месяц назад
  • Oral Argument on tariffs: Learning Resources v. Trump 2 недели назад
    Oral Argument on tariffs: Learning Resources v. Trump
    Опубликовано: 2 недели назад
  • Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case About Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act 11 дней назад
    Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case About Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act
    Опубликовано: 11 дней назад

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5