• ClipSaver
  • dtub.ru
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] скачать в хорошем качестве

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] 2 года назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument]
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument] в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [Oral Argument]

Oral argument audio (including transcript) of case [19-1392] Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization argued at the Supreme Court of the United States on Dec 1, 2021. More information about the case: Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v... Justia: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fede... (including opinion) Docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.a... Oyez.org: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/19-1392 Video produced based on information and transcripts on oyez.org, licensed under a CC-BY-NC License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.... Not affiliated with oyez.org or the Supreme Court. Argued on Dec 1, 2021. Decided on Jun 24, 2022. Petitioner: Thomas E. Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. Respondent: Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al. Advocates: Scott G. Stewart (for the Petitioners) Julie Rikelman (for the Respondents) Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents) Chapters 0:00:00 Scott G. Stewart 0:44:30 Julie Rikelman 1:23:55 Elizabeth B. Prelogar 1:50:26 Rebuttal: Scott G. Stewart Facts of the case (from oyez.org) In 2018, Mississippi passed a law called the “Gestational Age Act,” which prohibits all abortions, with few exceptions, after 15 weeks’ gestational age. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only licensed abortion facility in Mississippi, and one of its doctors filed a lawsuit in federal district court challenging the law and requesting an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO). After a hearing, the district court granted the TRO while the litigation proceeded to discovery. After discovery, the district court granted the clinic’s motion for summary judgment and enjoined Mississippi from enforcing the law, finding that the state had not provided evidence that a fetus would be viable at 15 weeks, and Supreme Court precedent prohibits states from banning abortions prior to viability. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Question Is Mississippi’s law banning nearly all abortions after 15 weeks’ gestational age unconstitutional? Conclusion The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, are overruled. Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion of the Court. The Constitution does not mention abortion. The right is neither deeply rooted in the nation’s history nor an essential component of “ordered liberty.” The five factors that should be considered in deciding whether a precedent should be overruled support overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey: (1) they “short-circuited the democratic process,” (2) both lacked grounding in constitutional text, history, or precedent, (3) the tests they established were not “workable,” (4) they caused distortion of law in other areas, and (5) overruling them would not upend concrete reliance interests. Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh concurred. Chief Justice John Roberts concurred in the judgment. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

Comments
  • Oral Argument on tariffs: Learning Resources v. Trump 1 месяц назад
    Oral Argument on tariffs: Learning Resources v. Trump
    Опубликовано: 1 месяц назад
  • Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [SCOTUSbrief] 3 года назад
    Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [SCOTUSbrief]
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • HLS in the World | A Conversation with Six Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court 8 лет назад
    HLS in the World | A Conversation with Six Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • EXPLAINED BY A LAWYER: DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND ROE V. WADE BEING OVERTURNED 3 года назад
    EXPLAINED BY A LAWYER: DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND ROE V. WADE BEING OVERTURNED
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • Oral Argument: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo 1 год назад
    Oral Argument: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
    Опубликовано: 1 год назад
  • How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade 3 года назад
    How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat 2 месяца назад
    Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
    Опубликовано: 2 месяца назад
  • FULL: Supreme Court Hears Landmark Case About Death Penalties For Low-IQ Convicts 8 дней назад
    FULL: Supreme Court Hears Landmark Case About Death Penalties For Low-IQ Convicts
    Опубликовано: 8 дней назад
  • The Great Dissent: Justice Scalia's Opinion in Morrison v. Olson 7 лет назад
    The Great Dissent: Justice Scalia's Opinion in Morrison v. Olson
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • Extended interview: Justice Amy Coney Barrett 3 месяца назад
    Extended interview: Justice Amy Coney Barrett
    Опубликовано: 3 месяца назад
  • U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Трансляция закончилась 4 года назад
    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Опубликовано: Трансляция закончилась 4 года назад
  • WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz questions Jackson on affirmative action case, gender definitions 3 года назад
    WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz questions Jackson on affirmative action case, gender definitions
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • Oral Argument on suing postal workers who don't give you your mail: USPS v. Konan 2 месяца назад
    Oral Argument on suing postal workers who don't give you your mail: USPS v. Konan
    Опубликовано: 2 месяца назад
  • Amy Coney Barrett’s Message for America 3 месяца назад
    Amy Coney Barrett’s Message for America
    Опубликовано: 3 месяца назад
  • Petrie-Flom Center | SCOTUS Revisits Abortion: Legal Strategies in Dobbs Oral Arguments 3 года назад
    Petrie-Flom Center | SCOTUS Revisits Abortion: Legal Strategies in Dobbs Oral Arguments
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • The 2023 Stein Lecture: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett 2 года назад
    The 2023 Stein Lecture: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • Obergefell v. Hodges: Oral Argument - April 28, 2015 (Part 1) 9 лет назад
    Obergefell v. Hodges: Oral Argument - April 28, 2015 (Part 1)
    Опубликовано: 9 лет назад
  • FULL HEARING: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments For Case On Trump's Firing Of FTC Commissioner 10 дней назад
    FULL HEARING: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments For Case On Trump's Firing Of FTC Commissioner
    Опубликовано: 10 дней назад
  • Rucho v. Common Cause [Oral Argument + Opinion] 2 года назад
    Rucho v. Common Cause [Oral Argument + Opinion]
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • Bush v. Gore Oral Arguments 7 дней назад
    Bush v. Gore Oral Arguments
    Опубликовано: 7 дней назад

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5