This is Isabella of Aragon, 1470-1524 скачать в хорошем качестве

This is Isabella of Aragon, 1470-1524

Inspired by the research of Maike Vogt-Luerssen, author and scholar of the Renaissance. Book: Die Sforza III: Isabella von Aragon und Ihr Hofmaler Leonardo da Vinci. A younger Isabella is in the middle. Isabella of Aragon, Duchess of Milan and Bari, daughter of Alfonso II king of Naples. Young widow of Duke Gian Galeazzo II Maria Sforza. Also, Leonardo DaVinci's "Mona Lisa". It is time the real story was told and accepted. The world is increasingly getting weary and disinterested in hyped-up theories, shallow conjectures, and sensationalisms that lead us to nowhere. Mrs. Vogt-Luerssen's research is the only one that offers scientific and historically backed proof of their true life, identities & harrowing story. If you are tired of the conspiracy theories and sensationalisms, and just want to know the truth once and for all, then see: http://www.kleio.org/Florence2012/Pre... http://www.kleio.org/en/history/monal... Fact is often stranger than fiction. Judge for yourself. Will you be convinced that the mystery has finally ended? Prepare to be astounded at the dozens and dozens of historical resources and even the visual record of the union of Leonardo and Isabella in Renaissance paintings! Yes! ... I said Renaissance paintings!! ... painted according to the customs of the Renaissance times. That is why there are so many reoccurring faces in the circle of the DaVinci's artist & student's. Not just any female could be painted as the Virgin Mary or the female patron Saint of a noble house. That was reserved for females only of the highest ranks. You will end up asking yourself what many other people are asking... "Why is this knowledge not known, and why don't the art historians and DaVinci 'experts' realize these things?" or at the least, try to explore and examine the research? or just disprove it? Why?? -(because they cannot) Mrs. Vogt-Luerssen has the ONLY ONLY ONLY theory that offers proof through DNA. Why has no one stepped up in the defense of science alone and settled the issue of her research once and for all? It has been almost 10 years since her discovery, and many 'experts' and art historians were made very aware of her historically backed findings. Why is her research not given full media coverage when so many other bizarre and far-fetched theories are? Theories that are heavily based in conjecture and speculation and very low on historical sources? Help correct history, and support Mrs. Vogt-Luerssen's research. D' Lynn I have photomanipulated the portrait on the left to simulate a realistic complexion and restore her true beauty, so that we may examine and learn her true features. Unfortunately, many extra-ordinary details of this astounding piece of art, cannot be duplicated in the process. Thank you.