Judge Revokes Bond After Explosive Hearing | Rebecca Miles Case скачать в хорошем качестве

Judge Revokes Bond After Explosive Hearing | Rebecca Miles Case

#BondRevocationHearing #RebeccaMilesCase #CourtSummary In the case of State vs. Rebecca Anne Miles, the court held an evidentiary hearing on the State’s motion to revoke bond following Miles’s new arrest on August 1st for domestic assault in Dixon County. The prosecution presented a certified copy of the new arrest record, arguing that under Tennessee law, a subsequent arrest while on bond provides grounds for bond revocation. The defense objected on confrontation grounds but the court overruled, citing prior appellate rulings allowing certified arrest records as sufficient proof. Defense counsel acknowledged the arrest but emphasized that the statute also allows the court to alter or amend the bond rather than revoke it. A witness from Serenity Ranch Recovery, Shonda Vargas, testified that Miles had been admitted to a 28-day dual-diagnosis rehabilitation program addressing substance abuse and mental health, and that the facility would notify authorities if she left the program. The prosecution questioned Vargas regarding Miles’s extensive criminal history, including numerous prior domestic assault charges, bond violations, and failures to appear. The defense then called Joseph Miles, the alleged victim and husband of the defendant. The judge cautioned him about potential self-incrimination if his testimony contradicted prior police statements. Joseph Miles testified that he and his wife argued at a restaurant, where she scratched his hand with a fork after accusing him of looking at another woman. He described the incident as minor, with no lasting injury. The hearing concluded with arguments over whether Miles’s bond should be revoked, modified, or continued with new conditions pending the court’s ruling. Subscribe My Channel[‪@CrimeCourt-1‬ ] Disclaimer: This is a neutral and concise summary of a court proceeding transcript. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent any legal opinion or advice.