• ClipSaver
  • dtub.ru
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland скачать в хорошем качестве

Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland 8 лет назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Does Congress Have Implied Powers? | McCulloch v. Maryland

Want a specific SCOTUS case covered? Your idea gets picked when you donate on Patreon:   / iammrbeat   Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.net/ Mr. Beat on Twitter:   / beatmastermatt   In the second episode of Supreme Court Briefs, Mr. Beat makes one of the most boring Supreme Court cases in American history somewhat more interesting. It was, after all, QUITE A FREAKING BIG DEAL. Washington, D.C. 1816 The United States Congress gets together to create the Second Bank of the United States. I like to call it the Bank of the U.S. 2.0. The bank’s main purpose was to handle all monetary transactions for the federal government. Most who supported its creation thought that the economy wasn’t so stable without a central bank. And yet, the bank still had its critics. The next year, it opened in Philadelphia, and everything was all groovy, until that same year the feds tried to open another branch in Baltimore, Maryland. But Maryland legislators were like, “oh, so you want to open a branch here? Ok fine, then you’ll have to pay a tax.” Well, it wasn’t quite like that. The state’s General Assembly just passed a law that said that all banks in Maryland not chartered by the state legislature had to pay a tax. The head of the bank’s Baltimore branch, James McCulloch, said “ain’t no way we payin’ that tax.” He felt that the law had been passed to target the Bank of the United States to hurt its operation. After he refused to pay the tax, the state of Maryland sued him. In a state court, Maryland argued that the Constitution says nothing about the federal government having the right to create a central bank. Therefore, any Bank of the United States was unconstitutional. Maryland won the case, but eventually the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court heard oral arguments on February 22, 1819. They ruled the federal government DID have the authority to create such a bank. Boom, take that Maryland. Their decision was unanimous. Chief Justice John Marshall, aka Lil’ John, argued there was precedence for a national bank. After, the First Bank of the United States came before the Second. However, more importantly, Marshall argued that just because the Constitution does not explicitly say the federal government can create a bank, doesn’t mean it can’t. He brought up the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which says Congress has the power “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper” to help the nation. Marshall said the federal government had several powers that weren’t specifically listed out in the Constitution but still were implied. Second, the Court said Maryland couldn’t tax the Bank because the Supremacy Clause of Article 6 of the Constitution said federal laws overruled state laws. Finally, the Court argued Maryland’s tax violated constitutional sovereignty by throwing a penalty to all Americans in favor people of the people of just one state. Man, Supreme Court. Mic drop. I guess McCulloch could take on an entire state after all. McCulloch v. Maryland justified the idea of “implied powers.” After this case, the Necessary and Proper Clause meant the federal government had powers beyond what was explicitly stated in the Constitution. It also justified the Supremacy Clause, giving the federal government even more power over the states. In fact, I would argue that no other Supreme Court case has done more to strengthen the federal government compared to the state governments than this one.

Comments
  • McCulloch v. Maryland Summary | quimbee.com 8 лет назад
    McCulloch v. Maryland Summary | quimbee.com
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • 4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation 4 года назад
    4 Hours Chopin for Studying, Concentration & Relaxation
    Опубликовано: 4 года назад
  • The Federal Government Gets More Power | Gibbons v. Ogden 8 лет назад
    The Federal Government Gets More Power | Gibbons v. Ogden
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • Classical Music for Brain Power - Mozart 8 лет назад
    Classical Music for Brain Power - Mozart
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • Махинации Верховного суда!!! 5 лет назад
    Махинации Верховного суда!!!
    Опубликовано: 5 лет назад
  • Is Gerrymandering Legal? | Shaw v. Reno 6 лет назад
    Is Gerrymandering Legal? | Shaw v. Reno
    Опубликовано: 6 лет назад
  • The Government Can GIVE Your Home to Developers 10 месяцев назад
    The Government Can GIVE Your Home to Developers
    Опубликовано: 10 месяцев назад
  • Can You Burn An American Flag? | Texas v. Johnson 8 лет назад
    Can You Burn An American Flag? | Texas v. Johnson
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • McCulloch v. Maryland | BRI's Homework Help Series 8 лет назад
    McCulloch v. Maryland | BRI's Homework Help Series
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • McCulloch v. Maryland | Foundations of American democracy | US government and civics | Khan Academy 7 лет назад
    McCulloch v. Maryland | Foundations of American democracy | US government and civics | Khan Academy
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • McCulloch v Maryland, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases] 4 года назад
    McCulloch v Maryland, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]
    Опубликовано: 4 года назад
  • Why Everyone Is Wrong About the AI Bubble 4 часа назад
    Why Everyone Is Wrong About the AI Bubble
    Опубликовано: 4 часа назад
  • Is Prayer Allowed at Public School? | Engel v. Vitale 8 лет назад
    Is Prayer Allowed at Public School? | Engel v. Vitale
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • McCulloch v. Maryland: The Birth of Big Government | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU 7 месяцев назад
    McCulloch v. Maryland: The Birth of Big Government | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU
    Опубликовано: 7 месяцев назад
  • McCulloch v. Maryland [SCOTUSbrief] 2 года назад
    McCulloch v. Maryland [SCOTUSbrief]
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • JUST IN: Supreme Court Begins New Term With Oral Arguments In Case About CFPB's Constitutionality 2 года назад
    JUST IN: Supreme Court Begins New Term With Oral Arguments In Case About CFPB's Constitutionality
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • Трагический заплыв лидера Солнцевской ОПГ и зятя Путина. Ольга Романова 19 часов назад
    Трагический заплыв лидера Солнцевской ОПГ и зятя Путина. Ольга Романова
    Опубликовано: 19 часов назад
  • The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Black American History #16 4 года назад
    The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Black American History #16
    Опубликовано: 4 года назад
  • Американская разведка: Путину нужна Украина и часть Европы (English subtitles) @Max_Katz 1 день назад
    Американская разведка: Путину нужна Украина и часть Европы (English subtitles) @Max_Katz
    Опубликовано: 1 день назад
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford: A Slave's Fight for Freedom | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU 6 месяцев назад
    Dred Scott v. Sandford: A Slave's Fight for Freedom | 5-Minute Videos | PragerU
    Опубликовано: 6 месяцев назад

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5