У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно सुप्रीम कोर्ट "अब जजमेंट में देरी नहीं Ravindra Pratap Shahi v.State of U.P. & Ors.(2025 INSC 1039), или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Download APP for Judicial Classes https://play.google.com/store/apps/de... Summary of the Supreme Court's Directions in Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. State of U.P. In the case of Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. State of U.P. & Ors. (2025 INSC 1039), the Supreme Court of India addressed the significant issue of delayed judgment delivery by High Courts. The case arose after a criminal appeal in the Allahabad High Court, which was heard and reserved for judgment on December 24, 2021, remained undecided for a prolonged period, leading the de-facto complainant to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reiterated and reinforced the guidelines it had previously established in the case of Anil Rai v. State of Bihar (2001). The Court expressed "shock and surprise" at the persistent problem of delayed judgments, which it noted erodes public faith in the judiciary. To combat this issue, the Supreme Court issued the following new and additional directions: Monthly Report on Reserved Judgments: The Registrar General of each High Court is directed to submit a list to the Chief Justice of all cases where a judgment has been reserved but not yet pronounced within the same month. Three-Month Monitoring: This reporting process should continue for three months. Chief Justice's Intervention: If a judgment is still not delivered after three months, the Registrar General must place the matter before the Chief Justice. Time-Bound Pronouncement: The Chief Justice shall then bring the delay to the attention of the concerned bench, directing them to pronounce the judgment within two weeks. Reassignment of Case: If the judgment is not delivered within the two-week period, the matter is to be assigned to another bench for a fresh hearing. These new directions are in addition to the existing guidelines from the Anil Rai case, which include: Maintaining a record of the dates when a judgment was reserved and pronounced. The Chief Justice drawing attention to pending cases that have not been decided within two months of being reserved. Allowing parties to a case to file an application for an early judgment if it has not been pronounced within three months. Permitting parties to request that a case be reassigned to another bench if a judgment is not delivered within six months.your contribution for UPI--- dkdubeysir@okaxis A/C --MMD EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION A/C Number - 1347102000005906 ( current account ) ifsc code. IBKL0001347 Bank -- IDBI, Mukherjee Nagar , Delhi Subscribe -- New youtube channel for english Medium / alawmagic facebook page---- / dkdubeysir Twitter -- / alawmagic website .. www.dkdubey.com Contact for Judicial services classes BY D.K.DUBEY AT magicoflaw@gmail.com, dkdubaysir@gmail.com, or at D K DUBEY'S LAW JUDICIAL Classes , DELHI 09, Whataap (For Judicial exam enquiry only at 9336207092 )