Iran Refuses to Disarm—and the U.S. Knows Why ? скачать в хорошем качестве

Iran Refuses to Disarm—and the U.S. Knows Why ?

This Isn’t a Simple Refusal Story. It’s a Strategic Sovereignty Logic Story. You’re not about to see Iran reject disarmament because it enjoys confrontation. You’re about to see how Iran’s refusal to disarm — specifically its nuclear fuel cycle and missile capabilities — is rooted in a deep calculus of security, prestige, and deterrence that Washington fully understands but can’t easily undo. Across multiple rounds of negotiations, Tehran has pushed back on demands to halt uranium enrichment, limit its nuclear fuel production, or negotiate its ballistic missile arsenal. Iranian officials insist these programs are sovereign rights and defensive necessities, tied to national dignity, deterrence against foreign strikes, and resistance to external pressure. This isn’t defiance for the sake of defiance. It’s strategic survival logic. In this video, Buddy Analysis breaks down the real reasons Iran refuses to disarm — why nuclear restrictions are seen as unacceptable, why missiles are off the table in negotiations, and why the U.S. expects this resistance and frames its policy accordingly. In this breakdown, you’ll learn: Why Iran insists on its right to enrich uranium and rejects “zero enrichment” demands — even during renewed U.S. talks in Oman. How Iran frames its nuclear program as a sovereign and peaceful right, not a bargaining chip. Why missiles and defense systems aren’t included in negotiations: Tehran refuses to negotiate what it calls essential defensive tools. How U.S. policy anticipates this resistance and instead pushes broader pressure tactics — sanctions, military presence, diplomatic isolation. Why disarmament is seen in Tehran as strategic vulnerability, not leverage How internal politics and regional rivalries shape Iran’s refusal Why disarmament demands have repeatedly failed to produce strategic concessions Where U.S.–Iran negotiations stand now, and why the core sources of disagreement remain unresolved This video explains how states don’t refuse disarmament simply out of defiance — they refuse because doing so would weaken their core security posture as they define it. It’s not about fear. It’s about how deterrence, doctrine, and national identity shape strategic decisions. Because when a government feels existentially threatened, refusal isn’t obstinacy — it’s strategy. ⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER This content is provided strictly for educational and informational purposes. Nothing in this video constitutes military, diplomatic, legal, or strategic advice. Geopolitical analysis involves uncertainty and risk. Viewers are responsible for their interpretations and conclusions. Always consult multiple reputable sources. Reported positions and negotiations evolve over time. 🔔 Subscribe to Buddy Analysis for system-level breakdowns of geopolitics, conflict dynamics, and how national strategy actually works beneath the headlines. #iran #disarmament #usirantensions #nuclearnegotiations #geopolitics #militarystrategy #middleeast #BuddyAnalysis