У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно No, Your Zodiac Sign Hasn't Changed или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In this episode I debunk the recurring media claim that your zodiac sign has changed by explaining the 2,000-year history of why western astrologers have deliberately used the tropical zodiac. Every few years, headlines circulate claiming that your zodiac sign has changed due to the precession of the equinoxes. Following a recent New York Times article making this claim, I decided to set the record straight. In this episode of The Astrology Podcast, I explain the history behind this recurring narrative and demonstrate why these claims are misleading. We'll explore the difference between the three zodiacs (constellational, sidereal, and tropical) and show how Western astrologers, starting with Claudius Ptolemy nearly 2,000 years ago, made a deliberate and conscious choice to use the tropical zodiac, which is aligned with the seasons, not the constellations. This is not a recent mistake or discovery; it's a foundational principle of the Western astrological tradition that has been understood for millennia by history's most prominent astrologers and astronomers. We will also touch on the issue of the so-called 13th sign, Ophiuchus, and why it doesn't apply to the system most Western astrologers use. My goal is to clarify the history so that you can better understand why your zodiac sign has not changed and feel more equipped to respond to these arguments. This is episode 509 of The Astrology Podcast. #TheAstrologyPodcast #Astrology #Zodiac Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:00:23 - Recent New York Times Article 00:00:52 - A Common Narrative That Goes Viral Every Few Years 00:02:22 - The Five Main Talking Points in Anti-Astrology Articles 00:02:54 - The Fundamental Problem & Rhetorical Goal of These Articles 00:05:20 - Explaining the Three Zodiacs 00:05:52 - The Origin of the Zodiac 00:07:12 - The First Zodiac: The Constellational Zodiac 00:08:22 - The Second Zodiac: The Sidereal Zodiac 00:10:50 - The Foundation of Western Astrology in Hellenistic Egypt 00:13:47 - How Planetary Rulers Were Assigned to Signs Based on the Seasons 00:16:48 - The Third Zodiac: The Tropical Zodiac 00:22:41 - The Discovery of Precession by Hipparchus 00:23:56 - Ptolemy's Deliberate Choice to Use the Tropical Zodiac 00:28:43 - The Source of Confusion: Using Constellation Names for Tropical Signs 00:30:18 - How Ptolemy's Influence Cemented the Tropical Zodiac in the West 00:32:34 - Historical Aside: Why Indian Astrology Uses the Sidereal Zodiac 00:36:51 - Famous Astronomers Deliberately Used the Tropical Zodiac 00:40:06 - Why the "Astrologers Made a Mistake" Argument is Flawed 00:42:31 - Rebuttal: Your Zodiac Sign Has Not Changed 00:43:29 - Rebuttal: The Ophiuchus "13th Sign" Argument 00:44:41 - The Underlying Goal of Skeptical Articles 00:50:43 - The Legitimate Internal Debate Among Astrologers 00:51:51 - Conclusion and Final Thoughts 00:53:32 - End cards