Extension Based Mapper Vs Delegate Based Mapper скачать в хорошем качестве

Extension Based Mapper Vs Delegate Based Mapper

Most .NET developers use extension methods for mapping. Senior developers use delegate-based mappers — and there’s a reason. In this video, I break down delegate-based mapping vs normal extension methods using a real CQRS + Redis + gRPC example from a production-style microservices setup. You’ll learn: ✅ When extension methods are perfectly fine ✅ Why delegate-based mappers scale better in real systems ✅ How delegates enable reuse, composition, and cleaner architecture ✅ Why this pattern is a solid alternative to heavy mapping libraries ✅ How senior .NET engineers think about mapping design This is NOT about writing less code. This is about design maturity, control, and long-term maintainability. 🚀 Want the full hands-on implementation? I teach this pattern end-to-end while building Amazon-style microservices using .NET, CQRS, Clean Architecture, Redis, gRPC, and more. 👉 Full Course on Udemy (Hands-on): Both are available on UFB. 🔗 https://www.udemy.com/course/building... 🔗 https://www.udemy.com/course/creating... (Getting updated in .Net 10) 📘 Free resources & links 🔹 GitHub Source Code – [Repo link] 🔹 Architecture Diagrams – [Optional] 🔹 Blog / Deep Dive – [Optional] 💼 Let’s connect I regularly share real-world .NET architecture insights (no fluff, no buzzwords): 👉 LinkedIn:   / rahulsahay19   👉 YouTube: Subscribe for more .NET & Microservices content 🔔 If this helped you 👍 Like the video 💬 Drop a comment (“delegate” or “extension”) 🔔 Subscribe for real-world .NET architecture content