У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Mom Claims Bias in Gal Report After Child Sides with Father или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Custody hearing for a child named Calista. Here's a summary of the key points: Case Background: A custody dispute between Erika Turner (mother) and Donovan Day (father) is before the court. A Guardian ad Litem (GAL), Miss Corey, has filed a report recommending that custody be primarily with the father, Donovan Day. Key Arguments: Mother's Attorney (Mr. Reed): Argues the GAL report is biased, relying heavily on Mr. Day's accounts and neglecting evidence of Mr. Day's neglectful behavior (failing to provide financial support) and potential narcissistic abuse. He highlights Miss Turner's financial struggles, partly due to Mr. Day's withholding of funds from the house sale, forcing her to live in a shelter. He also points to the lack of thorough investigation by the GAL, including failure to interview key witnesses supporting the mother and the insufficient consideration of the child's preference (potentially influenced by the father). He argues against relocation because it would disrupt the child's life and support network. Father's Attorney (Miss Schwantter): Contends the GAL report is thorough and unbiased. She emphasizes the instability in Miss Turner's life (housing, employment, schooling of other children) and raises concerns about substance abuse (despite a hair follicle test provided by Miss Turner). She argues that the father offers greater stability and is prepared to provide for Calista's needs (school, aftercare). She asserts that the Relocation Act does not apply because this is an initial custody determination, not a relocation case by the primary residential parent. The judge expresses understanding of the complexities of GAL reports and the limitations of their investigations. Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Evaluations: Both parents must undergo SUD evaluations, including collateral input from the GAL and the other parent. Parenting Classes: Both parents must complete parenting classes (Love and Logic for the father, Parents in Between for the mother). Family Wizard: Both parties must use the Family Wizard app for communication. Bias in GAL Reports: The court acknowledges the potential for bias in GAL reports but also highlights the practical limitations on the scope of their investigations. Relocation Act Applicability: The attorneys debate whether the relocation statutes apply to this case, given that it's not a relocation by the primary residential parent. The judge ultimately determines that more information is needed on this point. Best Interests of the Child: This remains the central focus of the court's deliberations, with "stability" being the key factor considered. The judge questions whether solely financial stability is enough to warrant a significant change in the child’s life. In essence, the judge prioritizes gathering more information before making a major decision regarding custody and relocation, opting instead for interim measures aimed at improving the well-being of the child. #ChildCustody #FamilyLaw #Legal #TexasLaw #Court #Parenting #Visitation #ChildSupport #ZoomCourt #Lawyer #Attorney #Judge #Paternity #Lawsuit #court #law #legal #justice #judge #attorney #lawsuit #familylaw #childcustody #parentingtime #childsupport #settlement #mediation #discovery #contempt #grandparentsrights #guardianship #texas #michigan #zoom #virtualcourt #evidentiaryhearing #trial #motion #objection #refereerecommendation #default #parenting #legaladvice #legalhelp #legalrepresentation #familycourt #familymatters #case #courtroom #legalproceedings #courtcase #lawandorder