(Almost) Every Type of Cognitive Bias Explained скачать в хорошем качестве

(Almost) Every Type of Cognitive Bias Explained

Free course on social anxiety: available as soon as we reach 3000 subscribers, so share and subscribe :) Video on all cognitive distortions:    • Every Cognitive Distortion Explained in 17...   The original article written by Buster Benson: https://betterhumans.pub/cognitive-bi.... Those paying close attention will notice that in the original article, Benson proposes four main problems: 1. There’s too much information, so we need to filter it. 2. There’s not enough meaning, so we use stories to make sense of it. 3. There’s not enough time, so we need to act quickly. 4. We don’t know what to remember. Later on, however, in other articles like this one: https://busterbenson.com/2019/06/03/w..., he mentions only three. This discrepancy reflects an easily noticeable fact: the problem of "not knowing what to remember" is considered a subset of "too much information," as both issues involve the challenge of processing and retaining relevant information in an information-rich environment. That said, I decided to stick with the three problems but use the strategies he mentions in his previous article https://betterhumans.pub/cognitive-bi... because I believe it’s more detailed, and in my opinion, the biases associated with each are more congruent. Another modification I made was to merge the strategies “We discard specifics to form generalities” and “We reduce events and lists to their key elements” because they essentially describe the same strategy. I also removed the strategy “In order to avoid mistakes, we’re motivated to preserve our autonomy and status in a group, and to avoid irreversible decisions,” because, among all the cognitive biases listed, most do not fit under cognitive biases, and the only one that matches the description is “Status quo bias.” Among the 200+ biases that exist, many are simply variants or subcategories of others. Some are duplicates, like the bizarreness effect and humor effect, while others complement each other, such as optimism bias and pessimism bias. Others aren’t exactly cognitive biases but rather basic cognitive principles or logical fallacies. The “Levels of Processing Effect” is an example of a cognitive bias that is not strictly a bias but more of a fundamental memory principle, even though it is listed as a cognitive bias on Wikipedia. In fact, I removed from the list of 20 strategies “We store memories differently based on how they were experienced” because it describes basic functions of our memory rather than a true cognitive bias. I should have also disregarded the isolation effect or Von Restorff effect, as it’s more of an evolutionary mechanism in the brain that naturally processes and recalls information. However, I received orders from above saying, “leave the flying penguin alone,” so I followed orders. Let me know what you think and if you found the video clear and intuitive. Studies/articles cited and not directly cited in the video: Driving test on the first try in Italy: https://motori.quotidiano.net/varie/c... Frequency Illusion Bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequen... Von Restorff Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Res... Three-number test experiment: “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task" by Peter C. Wason Naïve realism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na%C3%A...) Blind spot bias: Cited study: “The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others” by Pronin et al. Suggestibility Bias Study: “Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory” by Loftus et al. Replicability of Bartlett’s study on Leveling and Sharpening: https://link.springer.com/article/10.... Spotlight Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotlig... Chapman’s publications on Illusory correlation: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science... and https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1967-1... Duncan’s study on the ultimate attribution error: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1977-2... Halo Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_ef... Normalcy Bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalc... Outcome Bias Study: “Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.... Hard-Easy Effect: Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The calibration of probability judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 159-183. Hyperbolic Discounting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbo... IKEA Effect: “The IKEA Effect: When Labor Increases Love” by Norton et al. Rhyme-as-reason effect: https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...