У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Referees Never Get Blamed—It's Always VAR or Someone Else! Why Are Solutions Never Accepted? 🦓📺 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Another weekend of Premier League football, another wave of controversy—and once again, the referees escape blame while VAR takes all the heat. Sound familiar? In this video, we tackle the uncomfortable truth about officiating in English football. Why is it that the on-field referee is rarely held accountable? Why does the blame always shift to the technology, the VAR officials, or the system itself? And most importantly—why do genuine solutions always seem to get rejected? 🦓 The Referee Protection Programme It's become a predictable pattern. A major decision goes wrong. The pundits analyse it. Social media erupts. And yet, the focus somehow lands on VAR—not the referee who made the original call . The "Referee's Call" principle introduced last season was meant to empower on-field officials, with their decision standing unless there's a clear and obvious error . But has it actually created a shield? When a referee makes a poor decision, VAR gets blamed for not intervening. When VAR does intervene, critics moan about technology ruining the flow. The man in the middle? Somehow, he's never the story . 📊 By the Numbers: What the Data Tells Us According to the Premier League's own figures, officials got 86% of all key match incidents correct last season. After VAR intervention, that rate increased to 97% . That sounds impressive. But here's the problem—those percentages mean nothing when the 3% of errors happen in crucial moments that decide titles, relegations, and cup ties. The average VAR check now takes 39 seconds, down from 64 seconds after "Referee's Call" was introduced . Yet fans at the ground still endure long delays with minimal communication, and the in-stadium announcements introduced this season often lack detailed reasoning . 🤔 Proposed Solutions—And Why They Get Blocked So what could actually improve things? Plenty of ideas have been floated, yet meaningful change remains slow. · Time Limits on VAR Checks: Could a 30 or 60-second limit speed things up? The BBC recently explored this, using examples like Darwin Nunez's disallowed goal at Newcastle in 2023, where the correct angle took over 40 seconds to find. With a strict time limit, that goal would have been wrongly disallowed . The fear of more mistakes keeps this idea on the shelf. · Set VAR Teams: Mirror Football's John Cross suggests having dedicated VAR teams who work together consistently would improve understanding and consistency. PGMOL says it's "nigh-on impossible" due to referee availability and club allegiances . · Captain's Challenge: Borrowed from cricket and rugby league, giving each team one or two challenges per match could empower managers and players while reducing VAR overreach . It works in other sports—so why not football? · Independent Review Panels: Publishing weekly reports explaining controversial calls could address concerns about bias toward bigger clubs. Data from the opening weekend this season suggested penalties were awarded at a higher rate than the seasonal average, and transparency could curb such trends . · Expanding VAR's Authority: Ironically, IFAB is currently considering giving VAR more power—including reviewing second yellow cards and incorrect corner kick decisions . More technology, not less, seems to be the direction of travel. 🗣️ What the Managers Say The divide among those in the game is striking. Liverpool's Arne Slot wants VAR limited to "clear-cut decisions." Aston Villa's Unai Emery calls it "necessary." Pep Guardiola acknowledges its benefits but remains uncertain if it improves the game overall . Even ex-players like Danny Murphy have suggested football might be better without VAR entirely . 👀 The Bigger Picture: "Captains Only" and Behaviour Change 💬 Let's Talk About It This isn't about bashing referees—officiating a Premier League game is incredibly difficult. It's about asking why the current system seems designed to deflect blame rather than embrace accountability. Why do sensible solutions keep getting rejected? And most importantly—what will it take for something to actually change? Drop your thoughts in the comments. Should we scrap VAR entirely? Introduce captain's challenges? Set time limits? Let's hear your solutions. #VAR #PremierLeague #Referees #PGMOL #FootballControversy #Refs #FootballDebate #TechnologyInFootball #PL #EnglishFootball #VARDebate #FootballFans --- Sources: · BBC Sport on VAR time limits and delays · Premier League official 2025/26 rule changes · Mirror Football on VAR improvement proposals · Dhaka Tribune on VAR debate and manager views · Apex Football on Premier League officiating and proposed solutions Disclaimer: This video is for discussion and entertainment purposes, representing fan perspectives on officiating in the Premier League.