У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Why former SCOTUS Justice Breyer Chooses a Purpose-Oriented Approach или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
As an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court for almost three decades, Stephen Breyer was no stranger to hearing arguments for cases, whether landmark, federal, or otherwise, that reached the highest court in the land. In this conversation episode, our moderator-in-chief, John Donvan and Chief Content Officer, Lia Matthow, interview Justice Breyer, to discuss his book “Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, not Textualism,”. Justice Stephen Breyer pulls back the curtain on life behind the bench—and makes a bold case for how he thinks we should interpret the Constitution and how he debated with his esteemed colleagues. From his famous debates with Justice Scalia to his dissent in Dobbs v. Jackson, Breyer explains why he rejects textualism and originalism—and why he thinks it matters for every American. He shares insights on Roe v. Wade, the rise of conservative legal theory, and what he thinks is at stake when judges “just read the words.” If you’ve ever wondered how the Court works—or whether it's become too political—and how cases are debated--this conversation will challenge your assumptions. Topics include: Why Breyer says textualism is a “false promise” His friendship (and debates) with Justice Scalia The truth about how decisions are made behind closed doors How Dobbs could influence other decisions Our Guest: Stephen Breyer, Former United States Supreme Court Justice Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan and Lia Matthow, Chief Content Officer of Open to Debate, moderates #opentodebate #supremecourt #StephenBreyer #roevswade #scotus #judicial #law #constitutionallaw #lawandpolitics =================================== Subscribe: / @opentodebate Official site: https://opentodebate.org/ Newsletter: https://opentodebate.org/insight/ X: / opentodebateorg Facebook: / beopentodebate LinkedIn: / opentodebate Instagram: / opentodebateorg TikTok: / opentodebateorg Open to Debate Apple Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/bdzmz5xt Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/22tuxu7h =================================== 00:00:00 — Introduction: Why Former SCOTUS Justice Breyer Chooses a Purpose-Oriented Approach 00:02:39 — Justice Stephen Breyer on Why He Wrote "Reading the Constitution" 00:04:01 — Pragmatism vs. Textualism vs. Originalism Explained 00:06:23 — Breyer and Scalia’s Friendly Constitutional Debate 00:09:21 — The Limits of a Textualist Approach 00:15:01 — Dobbs and the Overturning of Roe v. Wade 00:18:57 — The Bruen Gun Case 00:24:10 — What Drew Justice Breyer to the Law 00:27:06 — What Does It Feel Like to Be a Supreme Court Justice? 00:31:29 — Redistricting Cases 00:32:32 — How Does the Supreme Court Choose Its Cases? 00:37:58 — Writing the Majority Opinion and Building a Coalition 00:41:07 — Can Justices Be Persuaded? 00:42:52 — What’s at Stake Today? 00:44:37 — How Important Is It For the Public to Understand Supreme Court Opinions? 00:48:12 — Final Thoughts