У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Debunking The Myth of ‘Late Icon Veneration или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Icon veneration is often dismissed as a late Christian innovation—something allegedly introduced centuries after the time of Christ and the apostles. In this video, that claim is carefully examined and shown to be historically unsustainable. Drawing on archaeological evidence, especially the 2nd–3rd century synagogue and Christian sites at Dura-Europos, this presentation demonstrates that sacred images and visual theology were already embedded in Jewish and early Christian worship well before Nicaea and long before later iconoclastic controversies. By comparing: Early synagogue iconography Early Christian architectural continuity The relationship between image, worship, and theology And the difference between veneration and idolatry this video shows that icon veneration did not emerge as an ad hoc development, but as a continuation of biblical and Second-Temple Jewish practice—later clarified, not invented, by the Church. This discussion is especially relevant for Christians wrestling with claims that icons are pagan, unbiblical, or historically late, and for anyone interested in how archaeology, history, and theology intersect in early Christianity. 00:09 – Framing the objection: “Tradition was invented later” 00:39 – Introducing the archaeological challenge to ad-hoc claims 00:55 – Discovery of the Dura Europos Synagogue 01:02 – Misidentified “church” and the synagogue excavation 02:13 – Video evidence from the museum explained 02:51 – Dating the synagogue (2nd–3rd century) 03:30 – Visual parallels with early Christian churches 04:06 – Reconstruction in the National Museum of Damascus 04:38 – Destruction in 256 CE and preservation by burial 05:16 – Why this site matters historically 06:05 – Archaeology confirms continuity, not innovation 06:20 – Final conclusion: Tradition predates Nicaea Full video here: https://youtube.com/live/lGiG22IdriM?... If you would like to support by donation, you can do so here: https://buymeacoffee.com/aminapologetics #history #archaeology #orthodox #christian #jesus