Codex 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: The Benchmark Nobody Expected. (How to STOP Picking the Wrong Agent) скачать в хорошем качестве

Codex 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: The Benchmark Nobody Expected. (How to STOP Picking the Wrong Agent)

My site: https://natebjones.com Full Story w/ Prompts: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/... _______________________________________ What's really happening when two competing visions of AI agents ship 20 minutes apart? The common story is that this is a benchmark race—but the reality is more complicated when the choice between Codex and Claude determines how your entire week changes. In this video, I share the inside scoop on why OpenAI and Anthropic built fundamentally different answers to the same question: • Why Codex bets on autonomous correctness while Claude bets on integration and coordination • How the three-layer orchestrator architecture enables hand-it-off-and-walk-away work • What Agent Teams with peer-to-peer messaging means for interdependent problems • Where the meta-skill of evaluating new capabilities becomes the durable advantage For knowledge workers choosing between delegation-shaped problems and coordination-shaped problems, the right question is not which tool wins—it's which organizational muscle you want to build. Chapters 00:00 Two Visions Ship 20 Minutes Apart 02:30 Codex as Employee vs Claude as Team 06:05 Codex Benchmarks: 12 Points Ahead on Terminal Bench 07:48 The First Model That Helped Build Itself 09:31 The Codex Desktop App: A Command Center 11:57 The Three-Layer Trust Architecture 15:17 Non-Coding Uses: Meeting Transcripts to Regulatory Filings 17:56 Opus 4.6: Integration Over Isolation 20:16 Agent Teams With Peer-to-Peer Coordination 22:36 Three Questions for Choosing Between Them 25:35 Which Approach Ages Better 28:01 The Meta-Skill That Becomes Durable Subscribe for daily AI strategy and news. For deeper playbooks and analysis: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/