У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Mamluks: How Slave Soldiers Stopped the Mongol Empire или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The Mamluks were not a typical medieval army. They were a military engineering project—boys purchased from Eurasian slave markets, subjected to a decade-long training protocol, and transformed into the most expensive and effective heavy cavalry of the 13th century. In 1260, at Ain Jalut, they achieved what no other force had accomplished: the decisive defeat of Mongol heavy cavalry in open battle. This documentary examines the technical architecture of the Mamluk system: the Furusiyya training protocols that produced 90-pound bow specialists capable of firing accurately from galloping horses, the metallurgy of Damascus steel kilij sabers optimized for mounted combat, the biomechanics of lamellar armor systems that balanced protection with mobility, and the tactical execution at Ain Jalut that stopped the Mongol westward expansion. This is not a summary. This is a full structural audit of how a "slave-cavalry" system became the most resilient military caste of the Middle Ages, ruling Egypt and the Levant for 267 years until Ottoman gunpowder technology rendered them obsolete. ❤️Support the channel: https://ko-fi.com/ancientarsenal SOURCES & FURTHER READING: 1. Nicolle, David. The Mamluks 1250-1517. Osprey Publishing, 1993. 2. Amitai-Preiss, Reuven. Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk-Ilkhanid War, 1260-1281. Cambridge University Press, 1995. 3. Ayalon, David. Studies on the Structure of the Mamluk Army. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1953. 4. Nicolle, David. Arms and Armour of the Crusading Era, 1050-1350. Greenhill Books, 1999. 5. Paterson, W.F. "The Archers of Islam." Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 1966. 6. Latham, J.D. and W.F. Paterson. Saracen Archery: An English Version and Exposition of a Mameluke Work on Archery. The Holland Press, 1970. 7. Shihab al-Din Ahmad ibn Abd Allah. A Manual of Arabic Horsemanship and Archery (Furusiyya). Translated and edited by Latham and Paterson. 8. Smith, John Masson. "Ayn Jalut: Mamluk Success or Mongol Failure?" Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 1984. 9. Saunders, J.J. The History of the Mongol Conquests. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001. 10. Irwin, Robert. The Middle East in the Middle Ages: The Early Mamluk Sultanate 1250-1382. Southern Illinois University Press, 1986. 11. Amitai, Reuven. "The Mongol Occupation of Damascus in 1300: A Study of Mamluk Loyalties." In The Mamluks in Egyptian and Syrian Politics and Society, edited by Michael Winter and Amalia Levanoni. Brill, 2004. 12. Raphael, Kate. Muslim Fortresses in the Levant: Between Crusaders and Mongols. Routledge, 2011. 13. Metropolitan Museum of Art Collection: Islamic Arms and Armor Department (Mamluk lamellar armor, kilij sabers, composite bows) 14. Bodleian Library Digital Collections: Furusiyya manuscripts (MS. Huntington 264) 15. British Library Collection: Mamluk military treatises and illuminated manuscripts VISUAL SOURCES: • Metropolitan Museum of Art: Mamluk armor and weapons (accession numbers 04.3.179, 36.25.1186) • Museum of Islamic Art, Cairo: Mamluk cavalry equipment • Bodleian Library, Oxford: Furusiyya manuscript illustrations (digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk) • British Library: Mamluk historical manuscripts Editorial Note: This documentary is a result of original research and human-led creative direction by the "Ancient Arsenal" team. Every factual claim, narrative structure, and the final script is rigorously verified, shaped, and written to ensure historical accuracy. While digital tools are utilized for visual reconstruction and asset generation to bring history to life, the storytelling and research remain a strictly human endeavor.