jallikattu demonstration скачать в хорошем качестве

jallikattu demonstration

jallikattu demonstration jallikattu demonstration PETA welcomes apex court’s decision Welcoming the decision of the Supreme Court, which dismissed a review petition filed by Tamil Nadu government against the ban on jallikattu , animal rights forum — People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) — said the ruling once again emphasised that cruelty was inherent in such events and was illegal. “The Supreme Court has confirmed once again that compassion triumphs over cruelty and that jallikattu has no place in a civilised society,” PETA India Director of Veterinary Affairs Manilal Valliyate was quoted as saying in a statement. “We are relieved that bulls will continue to be spared suffering”. When jallikattu was permitted in the past, hundreds of human participants were injured each year and many of them were killed. Between 2010 and 2014, about 1,100 injuries to humans were reported in the media and 17 people died, it claimed. PETA along with the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) were the respondents in the case. The decision of the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissing the Tamil Nadu government’s review petition challenging the 2014 judgement that struck down the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikatu Act, 2009, attained “complete finality”, the statement added. Apex court refuses to lift ban on jallikattu The event has nothingto do with religious freedom, says Bench Questioning the need to “tame” a domestic animal like the bull, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea by Tamil Nadu to review a 2014 apex court judgment banning jallikattu . The court further held that the event had nothing to do with the exercise of the fundamental right of religious freedom. Rejecting the submissions made by the State government, a Bench of Justices Dipak Misra and Rohinton Nariman said Tamil Nadu cannot explain it away as a mere act of “taming a bull.” It said it runs counter to the concept of welfare of the animal, which is the basic foundation of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960. The State, represented by senior advocate Shekhar Naphade, had countered that the event was defined as an act of “taming” of bulls under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act of 2009 and did not amount to cruelty. “The 2009 Act was introduced to stop any kind of torture. Taming a bull is not torture. You cannot ban jallikattu just because there was torture long ago. It is like a bank stopping all loans just because somebody had cheated it once long ago,” Mr. Naphade submitted. ‘Cannot celebrate cruelty’ Appearing for the Animal Welfare Board of India, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, countered that “festivals cannot celebrate cruelty.” He argued that the 2009 State law was “repugnant” to the 1960 Central law. திண்டுக்கல் அருகே ஜல்லிக்கட்டு மீதான தடையை நீக்க கோரி பெண்கள் ஜல்லிக்கட்டு மாடுகளை வைத்து பெண்கள் ஒப்பாரி வைத்து நூதன போரட்டம். பல்வேறு போராட்டம் நடத்துவப்போவதாக அறிவிப்பு. This Video Covered From Dindigul District Reporter (Tamil Nadu) From South Indian Crime Point Weekly. For More Details Pl Visit : http://www.southindiancrimepoint.com/ or   / crimepoint   or http://south-indian-crime-point-magaz...