У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно There Was Never a Bridge Video или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
There Was Never a Bridge Why Subject and Object Were Never Separate Introduction Most frameworks begin by assuming we’re “inside” a private mind looking “out” at a world—then spend centuries trying to build a bridge between the two. This audio argues the opposite: the bridge project is doomed because the gap was never real. Before theories—before worldviews—you were already in contact: addressed, distinguished, responding, in time, with change. Those conditions can’t be denied without being performed. If that’s true, then what we call “knowing” is downstream. The order is contact → relation → recognition. And “givenness” only makes sense if it’s given by a person—whether we admit it or not. SECTION 1 — Before Theories: Contact Comes First We wake up in this world—just as you are now… …And the only way that’s possible is if time is passing. Orienting Note: Before we had concepts, explanations, or worldviews, we were already responding. Addressed. Affected. Distinct. This section grounds everything in pre-theoretical experience: contact, relation, time, and change are not conclusions—we wake up inside them. SECTION 2 — The War Room Mistake When I first started getting into this stuff, sometimes I’d imagine guys like Hume, Kant… …That’s why you’re even able to huddle over this map and come up with your theories. Orienting Note: Philosophy often mistakes its own internal map-making for the whole territory. This image reframes the tradition from the outside: thinkers are already relating, communicating, and meaning-making while trying to explain how meaning works. SECTION 3 — Denial Collapse: The Floor You Can’t Step Below These are the conditions that presuppose all intelligibility… …It’s an invariant constraint on reality itself. Orienting Note: Here’s the structural claim: contact, distinction, relation, time, and change cannot be denied without being performed. That makes them non-negotiable—not beliefs, not metaphysics, but the floor of intelligibility itself. SECTION 4 — The Bridge That Never Existed From an ancient Greek philosopher to you today… …Therefore, there was never a bridge needed to be built. Orienting Note: Once mind and world are assumed to be separate, philosophy spends centuries trying to reconnect them. This section shows why every attempt collapses: subject and object were never apart to begin with—they co-arise. SECTION 5 — Recognition, Language, and Givenness Contact, relation, recognition. All is given… …Whether you recognize it or not. Orienting Note: Meaning doesn’t originate inside a private mind; it arrives between us, through language and response. “Givenness” only makes sense relationally—and ultimately personally.