A life sentence for murder and abandonment of a body? скачать в хорошем качестве

A life sentence for murder and abandonment of a body?

(00:00:00) This Korean movie Parasite on the Upper Class depicts a family living at the bottom of Korean society. By chance, one by one, they entered a high-society family, but in the end they ended up in tragedy because their greed got out of control. A similar plot actually occurred in this real case in Taiwanese society. The victim's name was Acheng, and he met a girl, Xiaoxin, who was 23 years younger than him. For Xiaoxin, Ah Cheng gave up his originally happy family. He abandoned his family and his son, and after the two started dating, Ah Cheng almost responded to Xiao Xin's requests for money and materials. Moreover, Aicheng also took care of Aiwujiwu, including Xiaoxin's elder brother and younger brother. He sold his house and opened a plastic factory for them. Unexpectedly, one day Acheng was found meditating in the mountains of Linkou, New Taipei City, and the person who found him was a truck driver. At that time, he was driving on County Road 106. Because he had an urgent need to urinate, he parked the car on the side of the road and climbed a small slope. Unexpectedly, after climbing over the slope, he saw a male body wrapped in a quilt, stuck under a big tree. One day after the investigation of the case, Detective Assistant Yu Wenzhi received a mobile phone call. On the other end of the phone was the factory owner who had assisted the police in accessing key monitors. He said that he wanted to send fruit to express his gratitude to the task force. He also said that this was the instruction of the deceased. What's going on? The task force recalled that during the entire investigation of the case, there were too many unexplainable coincidences. It seemed that the deceased was also working hard to help the police catch the murderer as soon as possible. Achuan, who killed his benefactor, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2013. (00:46:31) This is Exit 1 of Kaohsiung Qiaotou Sugar Factory MRT Station. There is an open space directly opposite. In 2020, workers drove a strange hand to prepare the land here. Suddenly there was a loud noise, and they dug An orange plastic bucket, when the worker took a closer look, he was frightened! Because there was a female corpse inside the plastic bucket. The police found that the deceased had been soaked in hydrochloric acid, and the barrel was sealed with cement blocks. This Qiaotou barrel corpse case that shocked the society contained a secret from 6 years ago! In the murder case of Qiaotou woman's bucket corpse, although Azhong and Xiong Nu both confessed to committing the crime, they both claimed that they had no intention to kill. They even told the judge that they had performed CPR on behalf of the deceased to save her. However, the judge did not accept these arguments and ultimately sentenced the two men to 17 to 19 years in prison for murder. (01:33:41) After the justice ruled that the death penalty is constitutional, but the scope of its use must be strictly limited, greatly reducing the possibility of imposing the death penalty, another case has been confirmed to have escaped the death penalty. The family members of the victim in this murder case are also the family members of the perpetrator, because the murderer is his own daughter. Because her father was unwilling to continue to provide financial support, she actually teamed up with her boyfriend to kill her biological father. Even her mother wanted to kill her as well. The heartbroken mother asked the judge to sentence her daughter to death. Unexpectedly, the first and second instance judges found that there was a possibility that the two were being educated and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The prosecutor was dissatisfied and appealed to the Supreme Court. As a result, the judge also found that the sentence was appropriate. Although the two men were involved in serious crimes, they did not reach the level of permanent isolation from the outside world, so they were not sentenced to death. This judgment also does not violate the intention of the recent constitutional judgment on death penalty. After hearing the verdict, the family members said helplessly that the murderer had no conscience and the judge only sentenced him to life imprisonment. What could they do? This is the voice of the murdered family members. Even though 80% of public opinion opposes abolishing the death penalty, the Constitutional Court has set many hurdles for imposing the death penalty. Although on the surface the justice's explanation that the existence of the death penalty does not violate the Constitution, in fact the judge is unlikely to impose death penalty. What can the people do?