Guilty Donna Adelson's Fake Tears, Real Anger: Body Language Analysis скачать в хорошем качестве

Guilty Donna Adelson's Fake Tears, Real Anger: Body Language Analysis

Stop leaving yourself vulnerable to data breaches. Go to my sponsor https://aura.com/drg to get a 14-day free trial and see if any of your data has been exposed Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @drgexplains   Dr. G's Body Language Course: https://www.drgexplains.com/offers/CE... In this video, Dr. G — clinical and forensic psychologist and body language expert — analyzes Donna Adelson’s dramatic reaction to the moment she was found guilty in the murder-for-hire plot that killed her former son-in-law, Florida State law professor Dan Markel. As the jury delivered its verdict, Adelson broke down sobbing, shook uncontrollably, and repeatedly whispered “Oh my God,” to the point where the judge had to pause the proceedings and admonish her to regain composure. These raw moments offer rare insight into how overwhelming stress and shame erupt through body language in high-stakes courtroom settings. In early September 2025, a Florida jury found 75-year-old Donna Adelson guilty of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and solicitation of murder in the 2014 killing of her ex-son-in-law, Florida State University law professor Daniel Markel. Prosecutors argued that Adelson—motivated by Markel blocking her daughter Wendi’s relocation with their children—helped orchestrate a $100,000 murder-for-hire plot, becoming the fifth person convicted in the scheme . In court, upon hearing the verdict, she broke down in sobs, prompting Judge Stephen Everett to admonish her and remove the jury temporarily while she composed herself . Sentencing has not yet occurred but a case management hearing has been scheduled for October 14, 2025. Dr. G also examines Adelson’s behavior during the powerful victim impact statements delivered by Dan Markel’s parents, Ruth and Phil Markel. Their words — describing their son as “a treasure” and pointedly asking Adelson, “Was it worth it?” — landed with visible weight. Adelson’s posture tightened, her head dropped, and she turned inward, signaling a clash of guilt, grief, and defensiveness. Her sobbing and withdrawal contrasted sharply with the composed, grief-laden delivery of the Markels, highlighting the profound asymmetry between victim and perpetrator in the courtroom. Through careful breakdown of posture shifts, micro-expressions, and self-soothing gestures, Dr. G unpacks what these reactions reveal about Adelson’s psychological state and the unraveling of her control in front of the jury. This analysis not only highlights the emotional toll of a guilty verdict, but also the unique behavioral dynamics that emerge when families of victims confront those responsible for their suffering. #bodylanguage #donnaadelson #danmarkel ------------------------ Visit my website: www.drgexplains.com ------------------------ Dr. G is a clinical and forensic psychologist. He is a published author, entrepreneur, and currently conducts psychotherapy, and couples’ therapy. Disclaimer THIS IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT The information offered herein does not constitute a substitute for professional psychological treatment, therapy, or other types of professional advice and intervention. Dr. Garrison does not assume any responsibility for errors, omissions or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein. The informational contents are solely the opinion of Dr. Garrison and should not be considered as a form of therapy, advice, direction and/or diagnosis or treatment of any kind: medical, spiritual, mental, or other. Instead, the information is provided as entertainment. If expert advice or counseling is needed, the services of a competent professional should be sought.