У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Neuro-Economic Collapse of Modern Dating или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Dating apps have systematically dismantled courtship through a multi-layered failure cascade. This is the structural analysis: Economic Trap: Infinite choice on digital platforms creates cognitive overload (The Overchoice Problem), turning users into maximizers incapable of commitment due to perceived opportunity cost. Market Degradation: Information asymmetry (curated profiles) fosters cynicism. High-quality individuals exit, leaving a market saturated with low-investment users (The Lemons Market). Sociological Outcome: Attention asymmetrically concentrates on a small percentage of men, creating a harem effect and normalizing the non-committal situationship. Biological Hijack: App design prioritizes Dopamine (craving/chase) over Oxytocin (bonding/calm), making brains biochemically resistant to stable partners. Neurobiological Stasis: Users become trapped in a perpetual D2 dopamine-seeking state, unable to switch to the D1 maintenance/commitment phase required for pair-bonding. Macro Collapse: This widespread failure to bond results in Death Squared—the behavioral death of courtship, leading to inevitable demographic decline. Summarizes the structural failure of modern courtship, arguing that digital dating platforms have created a broken market and hijacked human neurobiology, leading to a quiet collapse of bonding and potential demographic consequences. Main Claim: The combination of dating app algorithms creating an artificially thick market and the resulting hyper-stimulation of the brain's reward system has fundamentally broken human mate selection protocols, leading to widespread dissatisfaction, non-committal relationships, and a systemic collapse of courtship. Logic: 1. Economic Trap (The Overchoice Problem): Dating apps create an artificially thick market (high participation/infinite options). This abundance leads to cognitive overload and the paradox of choice, turning users from satisficers (who commit when criteria are met) into maximizers (who constantly seek the mathematically perfect option). This results in choice paralysis (e.g., the phantom notification syndrome), where users are unable to commit to a present partner due to the perceived opportunity cost of missing a better option in the queue. 2. Market Degradation (The Lemons Market): The information asymmetry inherent in curated profiles (false advertising) leads to cynicism. Users are unwilling to pay the high price of emotional vulnerability. High-quality users (peaches) leave the market due to frustration, leaving the market saturated with low-quality, emotionally unavailable users (lemons). 3. Sociological Outcome (The Harem Effect): The market failure results in attention asymmetry, where a small oligarchy of high-value men captures the majority of female attention. This leads to the rise of the situationship, a non-committal holding pattern. Statistical analysis shows a significant disparity in single rates between young men (63%) and young women (34%), which is only mathematically possible if a small pool of men is involved in multiple non-exclusive relationships, leaving the majority of men locked out. 4. Biological Hijack (Dopamine vs. Oxytocin): Human bonding is governed by two neurochemicals: Dopamine (the chemical of craving/the chase) and Oxytocin (the chemical of calm/the bond). Dating apps are engineered as dopamine factories, keeping the brain in a state of chronic elevation and high-stakes hunting. This hyper-stimulation drowns out the subtle signal of Oxytocin. The brain, addicted to constant dopamine spikes, interprets stable, consistent partners as dim or boring, making users biochemically incapable of settling down. 5. Neurobiological Stasis (The D1/D2 Switch): Stable pair-bonding requires the brain to flip a switch from the D2-seeking phase (the hunt) to the D1-maintenance phase (mate-guarding/commitment). The perpetual ambiguity of the situationship and the constant availability of new options prevent this switch from ever flipping, trapping users in a state of perpetual seeking. 6. Macro Collapse (Death Squared): The widespread individual failure to bond scales up to a civilizational crisis. This is defined as Death Squared: the first death is behavioral death (the cessation of meaningful social interactions and courtship rituals), and the second is the inevitable biological death (extinction/demographic collapse) resulting from the failure to pair bond and reproduce.