У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Did Jesus Call Peter 'the Rock'? | Matthew или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
What does Matthew 16:18–19 REALLY mean — and does it support Peter’s primacy? In this hard-hitting breakdown, Sam Shamoun walks through the text carefully (especially the King James pronouns) to show that Jesus is speaking directly to Peter in the singular: “thou/thee/thy.” Sam then explains why the “rock” is Peter (in union with the apostles), how the Aramaic background (Kepha/Cephas) removes the alleged “Petros vs Petra” objection, and why the Greek wording is different for grammatical reasons (petra as a feminine noun). From there, Sam connects the “keys of the kingdom” to Peter’s unique role in Acts (opening the Kingdom to Jews at Pentecost and to Gentiles through Cornelius), and he clarifies “binding and loosing” as real Spirit-guided authority to bind Christians to commands and loose them from Old Covenant obligations — with Acts 15 (the Jerusalem Council) as the clearest biblical example. ⏱️ Timestamps 0:00 Matthew 16:18–19: the KJV pronouns (thou/thee) and Jesus addressing Peter 1:05 Peter is the rock (not apart from the apostles, but in union with them) 2:05 Aramaic background: Kepha/Cephas (John 1:42) and why it matters 3:35 Petros vs Petra: the “Greek difference” objection answered (grammar + naming) 5:55 Ephesians 2:20: apostles as the foundation, Christ as the cornerstone 7:10 Keys of the Kingdom: what keys do, and what Peter was chosen to do 8:05 Peter opens the Kingdom: Acts 2 (Jews) and Acts 10 (Gentiles) + Acts 15:7 10:10 Peter’s reluctance and God’s correction: vision, Spirit command, and mission 14:00 Binding and loosing defined: Spirit-given authority to bind/loose commands 16:20 Acts 15 climax: circumcision debate, grace in Jesus, and Acts 15:28–29 decision 💬 Does Matthew 16 strengthen the case for Peter’s primacy and church authority? Share your thoughts in the comments. 📢 Send this to anyone debating “Peter the rock,” the keys, or Acts 15 and binding/loosing. ✅ Subscribe for more biblical, historical, and apologetics-focused clips from Sam Shamoun. ⚠️ Important: I am not Sam Shamoun. This channel shares and edits his content with his permission to make his teachings more accessible and help spread the Word of God. All credit belongs to him. If you want to support him directly, please visit the links below ⬇️ Sam Shamoun's official channel: @shamounian Link to the original video: • Live Q&A and Discussion With A Gracious Mu... 👉 Support Sam Shamoun here: / shamounian or https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ibnma... 👉 Click here if you want to support my channel (not Sam’s official channel): / @moresamshamoun #samshamoun #matthew16 #peter #therock #cephas #kepha #petros #petra #keysofthekingdom #bindingandloosing #acts15 #jerusalemcouncil #catholic #orthodox #protestant #bible #jesus #trinity