Quick Comparison with Olympus Micro Four Thirds vs Full Frame Sensor. скачать в хорошем качестве

Quick Comparison with Olympus Micro Four Thirds vs Full Frame Sensor.

NOTE While I showed an image of sharpness, this was more around the concept that a 150 2.8 on a Micro Four Thirds (MFT) sensor will not appear the same as a 300 2.8 on a full-frame. To be fair to Olympus, I will DEFINITELY conduct a much more accurate comparison using the 100-400 f/4.5 vs the Nikon 800mm f/6.3 at a more comparable price point. This was a quick, fun comparison, I actually did for a friend to show the differences and decided to upload a version to YouTube, In this video, I compared a high-end Olympus camera body with a full-frame Nikon camera body. The main goal was to assess how a 150mm lens on the Olympus system, which offers a 300mm equivalent field of view, stacks up against a 300mm lens on a Nikon full-frame camera. For this comparison, I used the Olympus 150mm f/2.8 lens and the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 lens. The purpose of this comparison is to visually demonstrate that the 150mm lens on the Olympus, with its 2x crop factor, does not equate to a 300mm lens on a full-frame body in terms of image quality. While the Olympus system has numerous advantages, such as affordability and lighter weight, this comparison highlights that it generally cannot compete with the image quality produced by a good full-frame sensor. This is not meant to speak negatively about either system; it is simply a real-world example, and I encourage you to let the images speak for themselves.