Case 9 of 227: Fajardo, et al. vs. San Miguel Foods, Inc. (B-MEG Plant 1)G.R. No. 267580 | 11.11.24 скачать в хорошем качестве

Case 9 of 227: Fajardo, et al. vs. San Miguel Foods, Inc. (B-MEG Plant 1)G.R. No. 267580 | 11.11.24

What if you were fired from work and your lawyer vanished before filing your Supreme Court petition — should you suffer the consequences? In a shocking case that reached the Supreme Court, poor workers were abandoned by their counsel. The Court had to decide: will justice bend for the powerless, or stick to the rules? Fajardo, et al. vs. San Miguel Foods, Inc. (B-MEG Plant 1) G.R. No. 267580 | Date: November 11, 2024 In this viral labor-remedial law case, workers lost their case after their lawyer failed to file on time. The Supreme Court reversed the dismissal and allowed justice to prevail over technicality. Learn why this case is a must-know for every law student, barista, and legal advocate in the Philippines. Remedial Law (Rule 65 – Procedural Doctrine) Labor Law (Illegal Dismissal, Employment Status) #lawtokph, #philippinelaw, #remediallaw, #laborlawph, #rule65, #bar2026, #barista, #scjurisprudence, #minimumwage, #dueprocess, #justiceph, #legalupdateph, #legalethics, #supremecourtph, #legalrightsph, #lawschoolph, #lawstudentlife, #pinoylawtok, #attorneyph, #lawtipsph, #caselawph, #jurisprudenceph, #filipinolaw, #legalcontentph, #legalhelp, #tiktoklawyers, #legalcoach, #lawdigestph, #barreviewph, #pinoylegal, #legalremedy, #lawyerabandonment Should our courts prioritize procedural rules or the pursuit of justice when poor Filipinos are abandoned by their own lawyers? 📌 TOP 3 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: 1. Q: What did the Supreme Court decide in this case? A: It reinstated the workers’ case and ruled that the lawyer’s gross negligence should not punish the clients. 2. Q: Was this about illegal dismissal? A: Yes, but the SC didn’t rule on the dismissal itself—it only ordered the CA to hear the case on its merits. 3. Q: Can the 60-day Rule 65 deadline be extended? A: Only under compelling circumstances, like abandonment by counsel or deprivation of due process. 📢 DISCLAIMER: This video is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. While made using premium AI and based on actual jurisprudence, we do not guarantee that the content is free from errors or omissions. CHECK OUR PRODUCTS/SERVICES Use the Discount Code: ATTYEF for 10% Discount raket.ph purchase USE DIGEST.PH, Get 20% Discount using my Code: LRDIGEST 2025 and 2026 Cases penned by Bar Chairpersons: https://www.raket.ph/lawrequisitesph • 2025 – Associate Justice Amy Lazaro Javier: (P499.99 only) https://www.raket.ph/lawrequisitesph/... • 2026 – Associate Justice Samuel Gaerlan: (P999.99 only) https://www.raket.ph/lawrequisitesph/... Structure of the Compilation of Case Digest: a. Relevant image representing main issue of the case (visual learners-2026 Bar Reviewer), b. Facts of the case, c. Issue of the case, d. Decision, e. Thought provoking question f. Top 3 doctrines of the case, and g. Top 3 frequently asked questions about the case. • 331 MCQ Quizzer with Answers – 2025 Bar Exam (P100.00 only) https://www.raket.ph/lawrequisitesph/... • 655 Case Doctrines for Easy Recall – 2025 Bar Exam (P100.00 only) https://www.raket.ph/lawrequisitesph/... TikTok: https://tinyurl.com/Lawrequisitesphti... Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/Lawrequisitesphfb YouTube:    / @thelawrequisitesph9489   Blogsite: https://thelawrequisitesph.blogspot.com/ Get Early Access on YouTube Podcast Discussion (English/Tagalog): 2025 Bar Exam-A.J. Amy Lazaro Javier:    • Members-only videos   2026 Bar Exam-A.J. Samuel H. Gaerlan:    • 2026 Bar Examination - Associate Justice S...   Disclaimer: This content is for educational and informational purposes only. This page is not associated with any Associate Justice in the Philippines. We do not guarantee accuracy or legal infallibility. Content was produced using premium AI tools.