У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Astrophotography Coach: Improve Your Images Step by Step или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Want to improve your astrophotography results fast? In this video, I show you how I built the ultimate prompt to turn ChatGPT into my personal astrophotography coach. You’ll learn how to get detailed, accurate feedback on your images—from star shape analysis to optical flaws and processing advice. Whether you’re struggling with FWHM, star bloat, or noise, this prompt-based review process will help you get sharper, deeper, and more balanced shots. Join my Patreon site for getting cutting edge news about Astrophotography software and equipment, early access without commercials and tons of supporting documents: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=83665984 If you buy any equipment you may consider these three shops - by using the links below you support the channel: Agena Astro: https://agenaastro.com/?rfsn=7982331.... High Point Scientific: https://www.highpointscientific.com/?... Astroshop.eu: https://www.astroshop.eu/?affiliate_i... ------------------------ Prompt: Act as an experienced and skilled astrophotographer. I’m submitting an astrophotography image for critical review. *1. Files* Stacked, unprocessed master: M13_stacked.png Stacked, unprocessed master Aberration Inspector: M13_stacked_mosaic.tif One representative raw sub-exposure: M13_sub.tif One representative raw sub-exposure Aberration Inspector: M13_sub_mosaic.tif Final processed picture: M13.png **1.1 PSF Image Output: Summary ======= Source M13_Stacked N 50 (553) B 0.002652 A 0.039270 sx 4.224323 sy 3.950005 theta 43.495212 beta 3.231559 r 0.935062 FWHMx 4.13 FWHMy 3.86 MAD 0.000058 (0.000032 .. 0.024428) Moffat 50 stars Summary ======= Source M13_Sub N 50 (320) B 0.009740 A 0.095387 sx 2.260169 sy 1.809514 theta 42.805253 beta 5.083116 r 0.800610 FWHMx 1.73 FWHMy 1.38 MAD 0.000325 (0.000225 .. 0.004480) Moffat 42 stars Moffat4 1 stars Moffat15 1 stars **1.2 FITS Header M13_stacked var P = new FITSHeader; P.keywords = [ // name, value, comment ["INSTRUME", "\'Moravian USB Camera 1 (64 bit) (ASCOM)\'", "Name of instrument"], […………], ["ALT-OBS", "0", "Geodetic height (m) (compatibility)"] ]; M13_sub var P = new FITSHeader; P.keywords = [ // name, value, comment ["SIMPLE", "T", "file does conform to FITS standard"], [………………..], ["EQUINOX", "2000.", "Equinox of celestial coordinate system"] ]; *2. Capture Gear* Telescope / lens: Askar SQA106 (509mm F4.8) Camera / sensor: Moravian C1x26000 Pro (Mono, IMX571) Filters (if any): Antlia R, G, B filters Mount & guiding: ZWO AM5N, Guiding with 250mm Guidescope & ZWO ASI220MM Mini cam *3. Acquisition Settings* Target: M13 Total integration time: 120min Sub length & count: 60 s × 120 subs] Binning: 1 Calibration frames used: bias, flats *4. Sky & Session Conditions* Site & Bortle class: city, country, Bortle 5 Moon phase & altitude: new moon Ambient temperature range: 25°C Wind / transparency notes: clear, no wind *5. Stacking Workflow* Stacking software + key settings: AstroPixelProcessor, drizzle (droplet size 0.85, scale 2.0) **6. Processing Workflow (PixInsight) Dynamic Crop Gradient Correction SPCC BXT NXT Generalized Hyperbolic Stretch Postprocessing in Luminar Neo *6. What I Want* Critically: 1. Identify optical, tracking, or processing defects (coma, tilt, star bloat, walking noise, color cast, clipped cores, etc.). 2. Compare overall image quality and depth to what should be achievable with the above gear and conditions. 3. Compare the stacked master to the raw sub: what improved, what degraded, and why. 4. List the top actionable fixes for capture and post-processing to get closer to textbook performance next time. 5. Point out which processing steps deserve the most attention for extracting faint detail without sacrificing star quality. Give me your opinion about the image composition and appearance of the final picture from an artistic point of view Respond in a concise, no-fluff style with numbered sections: “Defects Found”, “Gear-vs-Result Benchmark”, “Stack vs Sub”, “Capture Fixes”, “Processing Priorities” and “Composition review”. ------------------------ Music credits: ORBITAL_StriKe by B E T T O G H | / bettogh https://bettogh.bandcamp.com | https://open.spotify.com/artist/3zDlq... Music promoted by https://www.free-stock-music.com Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... _____________ 🌌 Check out my work in deep space astrophotography here: https://app.astrobin.com/u/View_into_... Follow/Connect: Instagram: / view_into_space Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?... _____________ LIKE. SHARE. SUBSCRIBE. Give this video a thumbs up if you enjoyed watching 👍 #astrophotography #space #universe Thanks for watching the video Astrophotography Coach: Improve Your Images Step by Step