FLOOD CONTROL SCANDAL: CAN VIP WITNESS BRING JUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE? скачать в хорошем качестве

FLOOD CONTROL SCANDAL: CAN VIP WITNESS BRING JUSTICE TO THE PEOPLE?

Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson planned to present a "very important witness" on November 14 during the Blue Ribbon Committee hearing regarding anomalous flood control projects. The aim was to expedite the filing of solid cases against corrupt politicians, DPWH officials, and contractors . Potential Legal Consequences While the search results do not explicitly detail the legal consequences for actions during the hearing, here are some possible consequences, based on general legal principles and the content of the search results: Contempt: If witnesses refuse to cooperate or provide false testimony, they may face contempt charges . Perjury: Providing false statements under oath can lead to perjury charges . Obstruction of Justice: Attempts to obstruct or influence the investigation could result in charges for obstruction of justice . Witness Tampering: Influencing or intimidating witnesses is illegal and can lead to witness tampering charges . Subpoena: The committee may issue a subpoena to compel testimony or the production of documents. Failure to comply with a subpoena can also lead to legal repercussions . The Blue Ribbon Committee aims to uncover irregularities in flood control projects and pursue legal action against those involved, relying on witness testimony and documentary evidence .