Courtroom Chaos: Defense Fights Judge Over CRITICAL Evidence Timeline in Major Murder Trial! скачать в хорошем качестве

Courtroom Chaos: Defense Fights Judge Over CRITICAL Evidence Timeline in Major Murder Trial!

Was the court truly on notice from the beginning, or did the scope of this case quietly shift midstream? In this courtroom exchange, the focus turns to what time periods were actually in play, what the State disclosed early on, and how those disclosures shaped the defense’s understanding of the case. The discussion centers on financial activity spanning 2014 through 2018, repayment history, and whether earlier years acknowledged by the State can be excluded once an indictment narrows its focus. This clip highlights a core legal tension What matters more The indictment’s narrow timeframe Or the State’s original notice and factual narrative You’ll hear arguments about relevance, fairness, notice, expert reports, and why timing matters when jurors are already seated and testimony is underway. This is not about theatrics. It’s about procedure, notice, and the rules of trial practice. Watch closely and decide for yourself Was this really a surprise Or was it always part of the case