У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно अमेरिकी राक्षस के आगे सब फेल | TU-160 M Offer Rejected Now B-1 Lancer Is Priority | Subhankar Mishra или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
अमेरिकी राक्षस के आगे सब फेल | TU-160M Offer Rejected? Now B-1 Lancer Is Priority | Subhankar Mishra In this explosive and eye-opening analysis, we examine the strategic buzz around long-range bomber platforms and the dramatic comparison between Russia’s Tu-160M and America’s B-1 Lancer. Has a Tu-160M style offer really been sidelined? Is the focus shifting toward the B-1? And what would such a move mean for India’s long-range strike doctrine? At the center of this debate stands the supersonic Tupolev Tu-160, one of the world’s heaviest and fastest strategic bombers, designed for nuclear and long-range cruise missile missions. On the American side, the swing-wing Rockwell B-1 Lancer is known for deep-penetration conventional strike capability and high payload flexibility. This video dives deep into the operational differences between these strategic bombers. From range and payload capacity to radar cross-section, mission doctrine, maintenance complexity, and cost of lifecycle operations — every dimension is unpacked carefully. Strategic bombers are not just aircraft; they are symbols of deterrence reach and power projection. We explain how integrating such heavy bombers would require massive infrastructure upgrades, specialized crew training, airbase modifications, and long-term logistics commitments. The analysis also explores whether India’s current doctrine prioritizes multirole fighters and missile forces over dedicated strategic bombers. This is not just about platform comparison — it is about military philosophy and future war planning. The video also highlights the geopolitical implications. Why would any nation consider operating strategic bombers outside traditional nuclear powers? How would regional rivals interpret such induction? And how do evolving technologies like long-range cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons change the bomber equation? This is a must-watch for anyone interested in: • Tu-160M vs B-1 Lancer comparison • Strategic bomber capability explained • Long-range strike doctrine • Air power modernization debates • Geopolitics of heavy bombers • Defence procurement strategy • Breaking military and world affairs analysis If you want to understand whether strategic bombers fit into India’s future force structure, how global air power doctrines are evolving, and why such comparisons create massive debate — this video will change your perspective. Subhankar mishra channel Subhankar mishra new video Subhankar mishra defence news india russia america air power #subhankarmishra #Tu160 #B1Lancer #StrategicBomber #AirPower #DefenceAnalysis #Geopolitics #IndiaRising 👉 Watch till the end for deep strategic insights and the bigger picture behind this bomber debate. 👉 Like, Share, and Subscribe to support independent defence and geopolitical analysis. 👉 Comment your thoughts — Should India ever consider operating strategic bombers?