У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Geologic by Worldwide Flood #69 Ice Canopy & Radiation или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Contact me for discussion, questions, even to argue. Go to biblestudymanuals.net Then click on EMAIL button, or click on INDEX button and select what interests you or search on google: biblestudymanuals.net [+ key in what interests you] Geologic by Worldwide Flood #69 Ice Canopy & Radiation Notice the statement by Joan Engels in the Journal of Geology, [Vol. 79, p. 609] talking about the Potassium/Argon method... [She] says, 'It is now well known K-Ar ages obtained from different minerals in a single rock may be strikingly discordant.' In other words, they do not agree. Likewise, we notice statement in Science Magazine recently regarding lavas from a volcano in Hawaii. And we're told that 'The radiogenic argon and the helium contents of three basalts erupted into the deep ocean from an active volcano (Kilauea) have been measured. Ages calculated from these measurements increase with sample depth... [Now this is one eruption, one formation. But the ages increase with sample depth. It erupted and ran over the edge into the ocean] up to 22 million years for lavas deduced to be recent. ...it is possible to deduce that these lavas are very young, probably less than 200 years old. The samples, in fact, may be very recent...' [C. S. Nobel & J. J. Naughton, Dept. of Chem, Hawaiian Inst. of Geophysics, Vol. 162, p. 265] Now, it increases with sample depth. We also know that pressures increase with sample depth. They're actually measuring the argon which is rather abundant in the earth's atmosphere. If that atmospheric argon is incorporated into the rock, then obviously, it's going to skew the ages. They're assuming it all came from radioactive decay, but if it is included from the atmosphere, then it throws it off. But the fact [is] that it increases with sample depth and so does the atmospheric argon because of greater pressures. The further down you get, the more pressure, the more argon is going to be forced into the rock, so the 'greater age.' ... We can see what's happening here. You're just incorporating atmospheric argon into the sample and you're not producing a dependable date at all....