The Anatomy of an Excellent Methodological Review скачать в хорошем качестве

The Anatomy of an Excellent Methodological Review

What Does a Trustworthy Methodological Literature Review Look Like? Four takeaways: 1️⃣ Recognize Underutilized Review Types” Most reviews fall into three categories: critical, narrative, and descriptive. Exploring less common types, such as meta-analytic and umbrella reviews, offers exciting innovation and comprehensive synthesis opportunities. 2️⃣ Clarity and Transparency Are Essential: Clear reporting of procedures, including journal selection and coding processes, enhances the trustworthiness of your review. Transparency addresses biases and strengthens the replicability of your work. 3️⃣ Structure Recommendations for Usability: Organizing recommendations by research stages or step-by-step guidelines makes them practical for a wide audience. Including illustrative examples further enhances their application and accessibility. 4️⃣ Highlight Scope and Boundaries: Clearly defining the scope—whether broad or narrowly focused—sets clear expectations and strengthens your review’s credibility. Providing a "one-stop shop" treatment or addressing specific fields can cater to diverse research needs. Get open-access article: Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. 2023. Best-practice recommendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1): 46–76. https://www.hermanaguinis.com/pubs.html