How to Write a Git Commit Message: Conventions & Best Practices скачать в хорошем качестве

How to Write a Git Commit Message: Conventions & Best Practices

Ever think about getting Git or GitHub certified? I've got three free GitHub practice exams for anyone interested in getting the Action, Copilot or Fundamentals certification https://certificationexams.pro/others... Check out the GitHub certification site and let me know what you think! ********************* Git Commit Message Best Practices and Conventions A well-written commit message is essential for maintaining clear, understandable project history and improving collaboration. Commit messages describe the changes made, why they were necessary, and provide valuable context for other contributors. Good practices ensure that the message remains informative and concise, while following established conventions makes the history easier to navigate and maintain over time. Importance of a Good Commit Message Commit messages serve as a crucial form of communication in a project’s lifecycle. They help current and future contributors understand why specific changes were made, making debugging, code reviews, and maintenance easier. Well-crafted messages also aid in tracking the evolution of features, bug fixes, or refactors, creating a strong narrative for project history. Key Elements of a Good Commit Message Conciseness and Clarity: Commit messages should be easy to read and straight to the point. They should summarize what has changed without going into excessive technical detail. A succinct message saves time for future readers who may need to review hundreds or thousands of commits. Present Tense: Writing in the imperative present tense is a widely accepted convention. Phrasing like “Add feature” or “Fix bug” makes it easier to scan commit logs and ensures consistency. It reflects the action that the commit will perform when applied, rather than describing what you did in the past. First Line as a Summary: The first line of a commit message should be a brief summary of the changes, typically limited to 50 characters or fewer. This summary should provide enough information to understand the purpose of the commit at a glance. It’s a good practice to leave a blank line after the first summary line to improve readability in various Git tools. Detailed Explanation (Optional): If necessary, add further context below the summary to explain the "why" behind the changes. This can include motivations for the change, alternatives considered, or potential side effects. The detailed section, often referred to as the body, should focus on providing valuable insights into the decision-making process rather than describing each code modification. Linking to Issue Trackers: When working with bug tracking or task management systems, include references to relevant issue or ticket numbers in the commit message. This helps maintain traceability between commits and specific tasks or bug reports, making it easier for team members to cross-reference discussions or requirements. Consistency: Establish a team-wide convention or adhere to widely accepted conventions (such as those in open-source projects). Consistent structure and style make the history more readable and ensure that everyone follows the same rules. Avoid Overly Large Commits: Commit messages often reflect the size of the change. Smaller, focused commits with descriptive messages are easier to understand and review. Large commits that bundle unrelated changes make it difficult to grasp the reasoning behind each modification. Common Mistakes to Avoid Vague Messages: Messages like "Fixed stuff" or "Updated code" are not helpful and fail to describe what was fixed or updated. They leave other contributors guessing about the intent of the change. Overly Technical Jargon: While the technical details may be essential, commit messages should be understandable by all contributors, even those who may not be deeply familiar with specific areas of the codebase. Neglecting the Why: Commit messages should not only describe what changed but also explain why the change was made. Leaving out this context can cause confusion later when developers revisit the history to understand past decisions.