ఆర్థిక రిజర్వేషన్లకు సుప్రీంకోర్టు సమర్ధన || Why the Supreme Court upheld the EWS Quota? || скачать в хорошем качестве

ఆర్థిక రిజర్వేషన్లకు సుప్రీంకోర్టు సమర్ధన || Why the Supreme Court upheld the EWS Quota? ||

ఆర్థిక రిజర్వేషన్లకు సుప్రీంకోర్టు సమర్ధన || Why the Supreme Court upheld the EWS Quota? || Why the Supreme Court upheld the validity of quotas for the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS)? The Supreme Court in a three-two verdict upheld the validity of the 10% quota in educational institutions and government jobs for the economically weaker sections of the general quota introduced in 2019. While three judges held that the EWS reservation was constitutionally valid, two judges disagreed. The 10% reservation for economically weaker citizens of the general category – a category that includes those who are not members of the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes or Other Backward Classes – was instituted by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Union government through a constitutional amendment in January 2019. The Centre defined economically weaker sections as those with an annual family income of less than Rs 8 lakh or who owned less property than the limits it laid down. The Supreme Court is examining the legality of this definition in a separate case. Arguments against EWS quota: The petitioners who challenged the EWS quota argued as follows: 1 . The EWS reservation violated the basic structure of the Constitution as it reserved seats solely on the basis of economic backwardness rather than social and educational backwardness. Reservations are a means to compensate for past injustices and not a tool for economic upliftment. https://www.thealphabet.news/politics...