Part 2 – The Adam & Eve Story by Chan Thomas: The CIA’s Most Mysterious Book скачать в хорошем качестве

Part 2 – The Adam & Eve Story by Chan Thomas: The CIA’s Most Mysterious Book

What really happens in Chan Thomas’s mysterious “Adam and Eve Story”? In Part 2 we look at how Thomas described Earth’s past cataclysms — sudden floods, violent winds, and a complete shift of the planet’s crust — and why he believed these events wipe out civilization every few thousand years. We also explore how scientists have evaluated those claims, what the CIA actually did with his book, and how a single idea about pole shifts grew into one of the most talked-about “global-reset” legends of the 20th century. 📘 What The Adam and Eve Story Is Author: Chan Thomas, an American electrical engineer and writer. Published: 1963 (6-chapter book self-published through Emerson House). Main claim: Thomas proposed that roughly every 12 000 years Earth’s crust suddenly slips over the molten interior, rapidly moving the poles, generating worldwide earthquakes, tsunamis, and climate collapse — what he called a “cataclysm.” He suggested the story of Adam and Eve in Genesis, Atlantis myths, and other ancient flood legends were memories of the last reset. CIA connection: A copy of the 1963 book was classified by the CIA in 1966, apparently because it discussed polar-shift physics; a declassified, redacted version was released in 2013. There’s no record that the CIA suppressed it for secrecy about ancient civilizations — classification was routine for speculative scientific papers during the Cold War. Scientific view: Modern geophysics finds no evidence for sudden crustal displacement of the type Thomas described. Pole movements occur gradually through plate tectonics and geomagnetic reversals over thousands to millions of years, not in a single day. 🎯 Summary The Adam and Eve Story isn’t a hidden prophecy or proven science; it’s a dramatic 1960s attempt to link natural disasters, myth, and geology into one grand cycle of destruction and renewal. Its endurance online shows how compelling the idea of “global resets” can be — and why separating documented science from speculation matters.