У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Sergeant Tries to Kick Journalist Off Public Property—Admits NO Crime, Then Backpedals или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In today’s video, a police sergeant attempts to remove a journalist from publicly accessible city property—without reasonable suspicion, without probable cause, and without articulating any actual crime. It starts with “you need to check in.” Then it becomes “this isn’t public property.” Then it turns into “you’re suspicious.” But when pressed on the Fourth Amendment, trespass law, and lawful authority, the entire narrative collapses. The auditor calmly asks the right questions: Am I detained? Do you suspect me of a crime? Are you ordering me or asking me? What law restricts access here? The answers? Contradictions. The sergeant admits: No detention No suspected crime No posted restrictions No arrest And eventually? “You’re free to go.” This is a textbook example of: Policy vs law confusion Suspicion being treated like a crime Public property being treated like private space Authority dissolving when legally challenged Knowing the difference between a request and a lawful order can protect you in moments like this. Credits: I.A.M. Free - Inland Auditing Media - • POLICE CALLED TO REMOVE JOURNALIST FROM P... Watch the full breakdown and decide for yourself—was this about safety, or about control? Drop your thoughts in the comments. Would you have stood your ground? 👍 Like the video to help spread awareness 🔔 Subscribe for more police accountability breakdowns