У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Russia's Beating NATO /Andrei Martyanov & Lt Col Daniel Davis или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis... Andrei Martyanov argues that Russia is not fighting Ukraine directly but defeating NATO as a whole, exposing what they describe as Europe’s lack of industrial, military, and scientific capability. They claim Europe is “written off” by Russia and now considered irrelevant, while the U.S. is seen as overextended and unable to supply critical defense materials like air defense systems. Russia, according to the speaker, has shifted to a total war strategy—targeting Ukraine’s energy, gas, and industrial infrastructure, tightening what they call “the noose” around Ukraine and the West. Moscow has abandoned economic ties with Europe, viewing it as morally and politically corrupt (“a Satanist playground”), while still profiting indirectly through oil sales routed via India. The speaker notes Russia’s destruction of key Ukrainian industrial sites such as Motor Sich and claims major Ukrainian brigades are being annihilated or trapped near the Kakhovka reservoir. They also allege that Britain has taken over operational planning from the U.S., which is described as having “washed its hands” of the war. Responding to Western analysts like Ben Hodges, the speaker dismisses Western claims that targeting Russia’s oil exports or shadow fleet could cripple its economy, calling such views “fantasies” from generals who misunderstand strategy, logistics, and technology. Finally, they assert that Russia’s navy remains strong and globally active, citing increased Baltic and Pacific Fleet patrols—including ships armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles—as evidence of Russia’s expanding operational reach and confidence. Overall tone: Strongly pro-Russian, dismissive of Western military competence, portraying the conflict as a decisive geopolitical and industrial defeat for NATO rather than a conventional war with Ukraine.