They Argued if US Justice could Seize Foreign Assets Without Permissions. скачать в хорошем качестве

They Argued if US Justice could Seize Foreign Assets Without Permissions.

Did the Department of Justice just admit they can seize a physical factory in a foreign country without asking permission? In this wild 9th Circuit oral argument, a Federal Judge sets a trap for a Government lawyer who argues that the US Constitution has no borders. What starts as a dispute over a frozen bank account turns into a constitutional crisis when the DOJ claims "In Rem" jurisdiction over the entire planet. Watch as Judge Mark Bennett forces the government to admit the quiet part out loud—and then teaches them a brutal lesson on how to read the English language. CASE DETAILS: Case Name: United States v. Younes Nasri Case No: 22-55685 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Panel: Judges Bybee, Bennett, and Desai TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Does the US Own the World? 1:19 - The Government's "Maximalist" Argument 2:25 - The "Fentanyl Factory" Trap (Viral Moment) 5:37 - Judge Bennett: "Let Me Teach You How To Read" 8:05 - "Action Against the World" (Due Process) 13:58 - The Government Scrambles on Notice 17:41 - The Defense "Finisher" (Rebuttal) THE LEGAL BATTLE: The US Government is attempting to forfeit assets located in a foreign country (Liechtenstein) using 28 U.S. Code § 1355. The defense argues that under the Fold decision and basic Due Process, the US cannot seize property it does not control. The Government argues that as long as the crime touches the US, they can seize anything, anywhere, at any time. SOURCES: Full Case Audio & Documents: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/... #Law #9thCircuit #GovernmentOverreach #CivilForfeiture #CourtCam #LegalEducation Disclaimer: All footage and audio featured in this video are sourced from publicly available court proceedings and fall under public record or fair use for purposes of commentary, education, and journalism. No legal advice is provided, and all statements are opinions based on publicly accessible information. Sensitive material may be shown; viewer discretion is advised.