Assassination Attempt, Romantic Affairs and Suleiman Carrim to testify! скачать в хорошем качестве

Assassination Attempt, Romantic Affairs and Suleiman Carrim to testify!

On February 5, 2026, the Madlanga Commission delivered one of its most explosive days yet – and it’s sending shockwaves through South Africa. A man implicated in the inquiry had SIXTEEN bullets pumped into his car as he arrived home in Boksburg… and walked away unscathed. A senior SAPS brigadier admitted under oath to a romantic relationship with controversial tenderpreneur “Cat” Matlala. And in a massive legal blow, ANC-linked businessman Suleiman Carrim lost his desperate bid to dodge testifying. The timing? Suspicious doesn’t even begin to cover it. In this deep-dive investigation, we go chronologically through every bombshell moment from Day 54 of the hearings: Brigadier Rachel Matjeng’s admissions and the money trails The High Court ruling forcing Carrim to face Justice Madlanga The brazen ambush on Wiandre Pretorius How these events connect to bigger patterns of alleged corruption, intimidation, and capture inside SAPS and the NPA This isn’t just another commission – this is about the rot that lets crime destroy our communities while the powerful play games. If you demand accountability and real justice in South Africa, this video is for you. 👉 DROP YOUR THEORY in the comments: Was the shooting linked to the commission? Who’s really pulling the strings? 🔥 LIKE if this made your blood boil 🔔 SUBSCRIBE + turn on notifications – we’re covering every twist as it breaks 📢 SHARE this with anyone who needs to wake up to what’s happening Timestamps: 00:00 – The 16-bullet hook that changes everything 02:15 – Brigadier Matjeng’s shocking testimony 07:40 – Court forces Suleiman Carrim to testify 12:30 – The Boksburg ambush – full details 18:45 – Connecting the dots: intimidation or coincidence? 25:10 – Why this matters to YOU #MadlangaCommission #SAPSCorruption #southafricanews DISCLAIMER: The content on this channel is based on publicly available information, statements, and allegations. While we strive for accuracy, our videos may contain errors or incomplete information and should not be interpreted as entirely factual. Images and videos used are for illustrative or storytelling purposes only and should not be taken as actual representations of events or evidence. Our content is intended for informational and commentary purposes, reflecting opinion-based analysis and investigation. Viewers are encouraged to verify information independently and form their own conclusions.