У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Fighter Jet Crash Claims Are Going Viral: Here’s What the Data Actually Shows или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
PilotScope TV digs into a viral claim that sounds explosive and collapses under scrutiny. Were fighter jet crashes really “tripled” in 2024? Did “127 pilots” die? In this episode, we separate headline shock from verified data. Using Pentagon Class A mishap trends shared with Senator Elizabeth Warren, we explain what the numbers actually show, why the 2020 to 2024 spike matters, and why you should be careful with global, calendar-year claims that lump everything into “fighter jets.” This is an evidence-first breakdown of operational tempo, training disruption, maintenance strain, and transparency gaps, plus what reforms are being pushed to reduce the toll. If you care about aviation truth over hype, you’re in the right place. Timestamps 0:00 The viral claim and why it spread 0:32 The real data we can verify 1:18 What a Class A mishap means 2:05 The 2020 to 2024 spike explained 2:55 The 2024 snapshot that raises alarms 3:35 Which branches saw the sharpest rise 4:20 Likely drivers behind the trend 5:15 Why readiness is on the line 5:45 What reforms are being pushed 6:15 The bottom line and how to read future headlines fighter jet crashes 2024, military aviation accidents, Class A mishap explained, Pentagon aviation data, US military flight safety, Marine Corps aviation mishaps, Air Force accident rate, military pilot safety, aviation readiness analysis, Elizabeth Warren Pentagon report Disclaimer: This video is for educational and commentary purposes only. It discusses military aviation using publicly available information, reporting, and historical context. Some details about modern fighter programs remain classified, contested, or subject to change, so any timelines, performance estimates, or capability comparisons should be treated as informed analysis rather than confirmed fact unless explicitly stated. This content does not represent official government positions and is not intended to provide military, security, or policy advice. References to any country, aircraft, or defense program are for contextual analysis, not to promote hostility or fear. All speculation is clearly framed as speculation, and we aim to separate verified information from opinion and evolving claims. SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL FOR AMAZING AVIATIONS VIDEOS.