#63 Complication, revision and perceived health after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Prospective... скачать в хорошем качестве

#63 Complication, revision and perceived health after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Prospective...

Complication, revision and perceived health after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Prospective medium-term results for 2,340 women participating in the VIGI-MESH register Fritel X1, de Tayrac R2, Campagne-Loiseau S3, Ferry P4, Hummel M5, Deffieux X6, Lucot J7, Wagner L2, Debodinance P8, Saussine C5, Pizzoferrato A9, Carlier C10, Thubert T11, Panel L12, Bosset P13, Nkounkou E14, Ramanah R15, Charles T1, Boisramé T5, Bressler L16, Ragot S1, Cosson M17, Fauconnier A18 1. Université de Poitiers, 2. CHU Nîmes, 3. CHU Estaing, 4. CH La Rochelle, 5. CHRU Strasbourg, 6. CH Béclère, 7. GH Institut Catholique Lille, 8. CH Dunkerque, 9. CHU Caen, 10. CH Châtellerault, 11. CHU Nantes, 12. Languedoc Mutualité, 13. Hôpital Foch Suresnes, 14. CH Béthune, 15. CHU Besançon, 16. CHU Nancy, 17. CHRU Lille, 18. CHI Poissy-St-Germain KEYWORDS: Grafts: Synthetic, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Prospective Study, Surgery, Questionnaire Pelvic organ prolapse is a frequent situation which leads in 19% of cases to surgical treatment [1]. Information about the risk of complications and recurrence is essential to help women and surgeons in choosing the best surgical procedure. This information comes from the surgeon's experience and clinical studies. However, clinical studies (or the surgeon's experience) may be limited in the number of patients observed, which does not allow rare events to be collected. The VIGI-MESH registry aims are to collect the surgical activity for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in several surgical centers and to monitor complications, surgical revisions and women perceived health [2]. Here we report the first medium-term results of our registry. Read the full abstract text here: https://www.ics.org/2020/abstract/63