Judgment C-136/24 P Hamoudi v Frontex explained скачать в хорошем качестве

Judgment C-136/24 P Hamoudi v Frontex explained

Fundamental Rights – Right to asylum How can effective judicial protection be ensured for migrants who allege fundamental rights violations during operations involving Frontex? That is the question examined by the Court of Justice in today’s judgment in Case C-136/24 P Hamoudi v Frontex. The case concerns a Syrian national who claims to have been subjected to a summary return from Greece to Turkey in the Aegean Sea in April 2020, in a context where Frontex was conducting surveillance operations. After the General Court dismissed his action for damages for lack of conclusive proof, Mr Hamoudi appealed to the Court of Justice. In his short debriefing Judge Bernardus Smulders walks you through the key elements of the case and the legal issues at stake.