RUST - 7800X3D vs. 9800X3D - benchmark and comparison скачать в хорошем качестве

RUST - 7800X3D vs. 9800X3D - benchmark and comparison

All testing was done at 1440p. All graphics settings are maxed out. Both CPUs at stock settings except for EXPO profile on the RAM. Monitoring software is MSI Afterburner/RTSS and my custom sensor panel in AIDA64. — Full system specs — OS: Windows 11 (version 24H2) Motherboard: MSI B650M Project Zero (BIOS version 7E09v1D) GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 4090 GAMING X SLIM (24GB, GDDR6X) RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6000MT/s CL30 SSD 1 (OS and games): Samsung 990 PRO 4TB SSD 2 (footage storage): Acer Predator GM7 4TB PSU: Corsair RM1200x Shift AIO liquid cooler: Corsair H150i Elite LCD XT 0:00 Preface 0:59 Test scenario 1 - Large server 16:16 Test scenario 2 - Small server 25:01 Results and conclusions Please like and subscribe! Note 1: As noted by ‪@gerhardspring9966‬ testing with the 9800X3D does seem to have the 4090 pulling more power than with the 7800X3D. I am 100% certain the exact same GPU restrictions and OC were in place, as I double checked and they show on the sensor OSD. My reading of this is that, since there was less of a CPU bottleneck, the GPU was able to stretch its legs more to pump out more frames, and this obviously requires more power. Note 2: I accidentally came across this video (   • This Drove Me INSANE! 😵‍💫 9800X3D Stutteri...  ) where ‪@DannyzReviews‬ exposes an issue causing random stutters when using monitoring software —particularly MSI Afterburner— to keep track of GPU power values. He has the exact same rig as I do: 4090 and a 9800X3D. During my testing, both MSI Afterburner (with RTSS) and AIDA64 were running, and both were set to monitor GPU power. Given how terrible the 1% and 0.1% lows were, I’m pretty confident that all my testing was plagued by this issue. The good news is that both setups were tested under identical conditions, so the results are still valid for comparison purposes; only take 1% and 0.1% lows with a grain of salt.