У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Sciences of Hadīth are a Joke. или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
/ discord The sciences of hadith—ʿIlm al-Rijāl and hadith authentication—are riddled with contradictions, biases, and inconsistencies that completely undermine their credibility. Scholars can't agree on narrator reliability, with figures like Ikrima being both praised and condemned. Personal rivalries and political agendas shaped narrator criticism, making it impossible to separate slander from truth. The entire system relies on circular reasoning, where scholars blindly trust past assessments without any objective verification. Even worse, known unreliable narrators like Sulaiman al-Aʿmash were still accepted because of their influence, proving that hadith authentication was never about consistency. How can hadith be considered divine revelation when even its strongest proponents admit to contradictions, changing gradings, and government interference? The Quran declares itself complete (5:3), yet centuries later, Muslims developed an unreliable system to determine what the Prophet supposedly said. From Shia narrators in Sunni collections to contradictory reports about the Prophet’s own life, and even hadith that reject hadith authority, the entire system collapses under scrutiny. If hadith were truly essential, why did Abu Hanifa—the founder of the largest Sunni school—question them so heavily? Why do scholars like Al-Albani contradict their own hadith gradings? And why was hadith transmission so easily manipulated by political rulers? This video exposes the undeniable truth: the sciences of hadith are nothing more than a joke. For more: www.Hadithcriticblog.com