GLM-5 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex — Real Coding Test Results скачать в хорошем качестве

GLM-5 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex — Real Coding Test Results

GLM-5 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex go head-to-head inside Cursor IDE on the same real-world AI coding tests. All three models run in the same Cursor agent environment with identical prompts, one-shot builds, and zero human edits, making this a clean side-by-side comparison on practical coding tasks. 🎓 Skool community coming soon — exclusive content, direct access & Q&A. Founders lock in lowest pricing forever → https://snapperai.io/skool → Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex — (Original Test Video):    • Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex — Clear Winner o...   🧪 Test 1 — PRD-Driven App Build A complex real-time earthquake dashboard (QuakeWatch) built from a detailed PRD: Live USGS API integration Interactive map with clustered markers Filterable event feed Synced data visualizations (3 chart types) Performance constraints (bundle under 500kb) Accessibility requirements (ARIA + keyboard navigation) 🎨 Test 2 — Visual UI Rebuild All three models receive screenshots of the Stripe homepage and must recreate the landing page from images alone — matching layout, typography, spacing, and UI components. GLM-5 is significantly cheaper than Opus 4.6, but how does it compare on real coding tasks? This video runs the same benchmarks across all three models to see where GLM-5 actually lands. If you're building production apps from a written spec or recreating UI from screenshots, this comparison will show you exactly how GLM-5 performs against the current coding leaders. ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 GLM-5 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex Intro 00:52 Test 1: QuakeWatch PRD Build Time Comparison 02:20 Codex QuakeWatch Build Benchmark Dashboard 02:52 GLM-5 QuakeWatch Dashboard Review 04:09 Test 2: Stripe UI Rebuild Overview 05:22 Opus UI Rebuild Visual Benchmark 06:14 GLM-5 UI Rebuild Results 07:36 Final Verdict Where GLM-5 Lands 🔍 WHAT THIS VIDEO COVERS ◆ GLM-5 vs Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex on identical coding tests ◆ PRD-driven app builds vs screenshot-based UI reconstruction ◆ Build reliability, repair behavior, and dev-mode results ◆ Visual fidelity vs functional correctness tradeoffs ◆ Where GLM-5 fits relative to frontier coding models 🧪 IMPORTANT CONTEXT This comparison uses a single-agent Cursor setup with one-shot builds and no iteration. In different environments (Claude Code, multi-turn refinement, task decomposition, agent orchestration), results may vary. This is a controlled snapshot — not a statement about maximum capability. 📄 RESOURCES → QuakeWatch PRD: https://github.com/snapper-ai/prd-pro... → Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex — (App Build + UI Rebuild):    • Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex — Clear Winner o...   ▶️ WATCH NEXT → How the Creator of Claude Code Sets Up His Workflow:    • How the Creator of Claude Code Sets Up His...   → Don’t Use OpenClaw Until You Watch This (Security Guide):    • Don’t Use OpenClaw Until You Watch This (S...   → Generate Animated Videos with Claude Code (Remotion Agent Skill Tutorial):    • Generate Animated Videos with Claude Code ...   🔔 SUBSCRIBE AI coding workflows, agent tooling tutorials, structured benchmarks, and real-world model comparisons. 🌐 Website → https://snapperai.io 🐦 X → https://x.com/SnapperAI 🧑‍💻 GitHub → https://github.com/snapper-ai 🎓 Skool waitlist → https://snapperai.io/skool