У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно What If an employee is in possession of a low value item, is this dismissal substantively fair? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
What If an employee is dismissed for being in possession of items of little value — when will such dismissal be substantively fair? In this episode of our What If series, we unpack a recent and enlightening Labour Court judgment: Mpact Operations (Pty) Ltd v Metal and Engineering Bargaining Council and Others. We explore the case of a long-serving employee dismissed in 2022 after a single roll of toilet paper was found in his bag during a routine search. While the company alleged theft of their "unique" brand, the case quickly unraveled due to major investigative failures. We break down why investigations determine outcomes and why overcharging misconduct is a high-risk strategy for employers. Whether you are an HR professional, a business owner, or an employee, this case serves as a vital cautionary tale on the importance of defensible procedures and the burden of proof. Brought to you by Ross Simon - LLB, BCom (Law), Admitted Attorney, Legal Advisor from Maserumule Corporate Employment Law For more articles and corporate employment law resources visit our website at www.masconsulting.co.za