अगले चीफ जस्टिस ने झाड़ लगाई कहा सरकार पर विश्वास भी करो скачать в хорошем качестве

अगले चीफ जस्टिस ने झाड़ लगाई कहा सरकार पर विश्वास भी करो

Download APP for Judicial Classes https://play.google.com/store/apps/de... As of October 2025, the Supreme Court has delivered several key judgments concerning the Chief Information Commissioner and the Central Information Commission. A significant recent development is the Court's ongoing monitoring of appointments to address high vacancies. For your convenience, here is a summary of major Supreme Court judgments on this topic: | *Case/ Judgment Focus* | *Key Direction / Ruling* | *Date / Context* | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | *Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India* | Governments must fill vacancies transparently and in a time-bound manner; appointments should be from diverse fields, not just bureaucrats. | February 2019 | | *Namit Sharma v. Union of India* | Initially ruled that Information Commissions should have judicial members and legal experience. This verdict was later recalled and reviewed. | September 2012 | | *Chief Information Commissioner vs High Court of Gujarat* | For information/certified copies from courts, the mechanism under High Court Rules should be used; RTI Act is not the primary route. | March 2020 | | *Ongoing Hearing (Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India)* | SC monitoring appointments, expressed concern over vacancies & lack of transparency; Centre assured appointments in 2-3 weeks (as of Oct 27, 2025). | Ongoing (Latest hearing: October 2025) | ⚖️ Key Details of Major Judgments *Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India (2019):* This landmark judgment emphasized that the *Right to Information is a constitutional right* and is vital for good governance. The Court directed that: The process for filling vacancies must start **1-2 months before a vacancy occurs**. The **selection process must be transparent**. Details like the names of applicants, the criteria for shortlisting, and the composition of the selection committee should be made public. *Commissioners should be appointed from diverse fields* (law, social service, journalism, etc.) and not be limited only to bureaucrats. *Namit Sharma v. Union of India (2012):* The initial judgment mandated that the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions should function in benches comprising both a *judicial member* and an expert. It held that the Chief Information Commissioner at the centre and state levels should only be a person who is or has been a Chief Justice of a High Court or a judge of the Supreme Court. However, it is important to note that this verdict was subsequently *reviewed and recalled* by the Supreme Court itself. Therefore, its specific directives are no longer good law. *Ongoing Monitoring and Recent Developments:* The Supreme Court continues to hear the case of Anjali Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Union of India to ensure compliance with its 2019 directions. The Court has repeatedly expressed grave concern that high vacancies are rendering the RTI Act a "dead letter". In a hearing on **October 27, 2025**, the Centre informed the Court that the selection process for appointing the Chief Information Commissioner and other Information Commissioners was underway and would be completed in "two or three weeks". The Court has acknowledged the government's steps and, while expecting compliance, has scheduled the matter for further hearing to monitor progress. I hope this summary of Supreme Court judgments is helpful. Would you like me to look into the specific details of the ongoing appointment process or the status of vacancies in a particular State Information Commission?your contribution for UPI--- dkdubeysir@okaxis A/C --MMD EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION A/C Number - 1347102000005906 ( current account ) ifsc code. IBKL0001347 Bank -- IDBI, Mukherjee Nagar , Delhi Subscribe -- New youtube channel for english Medium    / alawmagic   facebook page----   / dkdubeysir   Twitter --   / alawmagic   website .. www.dkdubey.com Contact for Judicial services classes BY D.K.DUBEY AT [email protected], [email protected], or at D K DUBEY'S LAW JUDICIAL Classes , DELHI 09, Whataap (For Judicial exam enquiry only at 9336207092 )