Is Deno Really More Secure Than Node.js? (Brutal Truth) скачать в хорошем качестве

Is Deno Really More Secure Than Node.js? (Brutal Truth)

“Deno is more secure than Node.js.” That claim is everywhere. But does switching runtimes actually reduce breach risk — or just change the shape of it? In this deep architectural security breakdown, we analyze: Node.js ambient authority model Deno 2 capability-based permission system --allow-net, --allow-env, and scoped permissions npm supply chain risks Dependency confusion attacks Environment variable exfiltration scenarios Container and Kubernetes isolation IAM policy layering SOC 2 and compliance realities Runtime sandboxing vs infrastructure governance We simulate a real-world fintech scenario: A compromised dependency attempts to: Read process.env Extract secrets Exfiltrate data externally What happens in: Default Node.js? Restricted Deno 2? Hardened container environments? Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Most major breaches don’t happen because of runtime defaults. They happen because of: Misconfigured IAM roles Exposed CI/CD tokens Over-permissioned infrastructure Human error Weak governance processes Deno’s permission model enforces least privilege at runtime. Node.js relies on layered security at infrastructure level. Both approaches can be secure. Both can be dangerous. Security is not about branding. It’s about architecture discipline. If you’re building: Fintech platforms SaaS backends Serverless systems Internal enterprise tools Compliance-heavy systems (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) This runtime decision impacts your threat model. So the real question becomes: Do you trust runtime sandboxing — or layered infrastructure defense? Watch until the end for senior-level security insights and practical guidance on when to choose Deno — and when Node.js remains the stronger option.